Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings
By J. Ory. 2001
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bb95fd9063127e539a831af0b164986b2ad973e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Bert Brockx
- K. Bridges
- Philip B. Stark
- Richard J. Harnish
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
- Richard L. Freishtat
- Anne Boring
In Education
- Bert Brockx
- K. Bridges
- Philip B. Stark
- Richard J. Harnish
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
- Richard L. Freishtat
- H. Hornstein
Citations in the corpus
- An Evaluation of Course Evaluations (2014, background): “It is not clear how to make fair comparisons of SET across seminars, studios, labs, prerequisites, large lower-division courses, required major courses, etc. [10].”
- Effect of syllabus tone: students’ perceptions of instructor and course (2011, background): “Indeed, factors such as the instructor’s physical attractiveness (Ambady and Rosenthal 1992, 1993; Best and Addison 2000; Babad et al. 2004), gender (Feldman 1993; Basow 1995, 2000; Centra and Gaubatz 2000; Ory 2001 ), likability (Frymier 1994), reputation (Griffin 2001), and formality of dress (Gu”
- On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “For this reason, many faculty members have been questioning the validity and reliability of SET results for many years (Ory, 2001).”