The performance implications of entrepreneurial proclivity: A dynamic capabilties approach
By David A. Griffith, S. Noble, Qimei Chen. 2006
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b9914061e4d1fd46d4180dea7736b2b75ac46cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities (2014, unknown): “, 2006) or only subjective measures (Garcı́a-Morales, LlorensMontes, et al., 2007; Garcı́a-Morales, Ruiz-Moreno, et al., 2007; Griffith et al., 2006; Newbert, Gopalakrishnan, & Kirchhoff, 2008; Song et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007).”
- How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies (2010, background): “For example, Benner (2006) proposes that responsiveness to technological changes represents an element of dynamic capabilities in the digital photography industry setting (see also Griffith et al., 2006).”
- Antecedents and consequences of marketing dynamic capabilities in international joint ventures (2009, background): “Although the dynamic capabilities theory has been cited in marketing studies, such as the effect of entrepreneurial proclivity on retailers’ market responsiveness ( Griffith, Noble, & Chen, 2006 ), no one has attempted to conceptualize and operationalize MDCs and assess their direct effect on perfor”