The case for emotional intelligence in organizational research

By Peter J. Jordan, Neal M. Ashkanasy, Charmine E J Härtel. 2003

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69432dd0e22b01312b64a2fb7be4d1c61371be88

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Neal M. Ashkanasy
2. Ashlea Troth
3. Peter J. Jordan
4. C. Daus
5. Darlene D. Bay
6. R. Callister
7. Kim McKeage
8. R. Humphrey

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Neal M. Ashkanasy
2. Ashlea Troth
3. Peter J. Jordan
4. C. Daus
5. R. Humphrey
6. Deanna Geddes
7. Darlene D. Bay
8. R. Callister

In Social Psychology

1. Neal M. Ashkanasy
2. Ashlea Troth
3. Peter J. Jordan
4. C. Daus
5. Darlene D. Bay
6. Kim McKeage
7. R. Humphrey
8. Deanna Geddes

Citations in the corpus

• Managing Emotions During Team Problem Solving: Emotional Intelligence and Conflict Resolution (2004, background): “In previous research, Jordan and Troth (2002) found a link between collaboration as a preferred style of conflict resolution and the ability to deal with one’s own emotions and the ability to deal with others’ emotions.”
• Emotional Intelligence in Undergraduate Accounting Students: Preliminary Assessment (2006, background): “This definition has been cited as ‘the recognized standard for scholarly discourse’ (Jordan et al , 2003 ).”
• Crossing the line(s): A dual threshold model of anger in organizations (2007, background): “…levels of violence and other deviant behaviors (Cobb & Mayer, 2000; Mayer, 2001), whereas lower emotional intelligence is associated with more negative emotional reactions when individuals respond to environmental demands and pressures (Jordan et al., 2003; Matthews, Zeidner, & Roberts, 2002).”
• Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, unknown): “The most broadly accepted academic conceptualisation of EI, however is the Mayer and Salovey ability model (see Ashkanasy and Daus 2005; Cȏté 2014; Jordan et al. 2003), which involves four “branches:” (1) ability to perceive emotion, (2) ability to use emotions to facilitate thought, (3) emotional…”
• Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated (2005, background): “They need to understand that emotional intelligence is defined in Mayer and Salovey (1997). While research is sure to elaborate and to challenge this theory (e.”