Bullying at work: the impact of shame among university and college lecturers
By D. Lewis. 2004
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/693777679157f21bc18b53f70a5944d289ad1f15
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Stefan Thau
- Jennifer Hobson
- Karl Aquino
- Petr Kveton
- Chen Zhou
- Craig S. Webster
- P. Adams
- Marcus Henning
In Sociology and Political Science
- Stefan Thau
- Karl Aquino
- Jennifer Hobson
- Petr Kveton
- Chen Zhou
- Craig S. Webster
- P. Adams
- Marcus Henning
Citations in the corpus
- Workplace harassment among staff in higher education: a systematic review (2017, background): “And (3) in-depth interviews with victims of bullying UK- Wales Employee roles and relationships, causes, types Lewis (2004) Considered the links between bullying and shame Qualitative: unstructured interviews (n = 15).”
- Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, unknown): “…by others (Lee 1997), feelings of profound shame, as found in a study of college and university lecturers who had experienced workplace bullying (Lewis 2004), and concern about the ability of the organisation to respond effectively (Ferris 2004; Hoel and Cooper 2000) may further prevent someone…”
- Measuring bullying at work with the short-negative acts questionnaire: identification of targets and criterion validity (2019, unknown): “As people may have different personal thresholds for labelling themselves as a victim, the self-labelling method comprises a very subjective approach in which personality, emotional factors, and cognitive factors may figure as potential biases (Felblinger, 2008; Lewis, 2004; Nielsen et al., 2011).”
- Preventing workplace mobbing and bullying with effective organizational consultation, policies, and legislation. (2009, background): “Indeed, at some point in the mobbing process, targets can become so worn down, hypervigilant, and relatively helpless that their behavior, while making sense in context, provided support for the mobbers’ and subsequent organizational view of them as troubled and problematic (Leymann, 1990). Einarsen”
- Prevalence and Forms of Workplace Bullying Among University Employees (2012, background): “The relatively high incidence of bullying in universities have been attributed to specific social and work features of the academic profession (Keashly and Neuman 2010) and, perhaps more prominently, to the recent corporatization of Western universities and other higher education institutions (Lewis”
- Victims of educator-targeted bullying: a qualitative study (2010, background): “so helpless”), self-repulsion (“I’m doing the cowardly thing”), embarrassment (“they deprive me of my dignity”), a lack of self-esteem (“maybe I’m not a good teacher”) and withdrawal from others (“I don’t go to the staff room”) (Lewis, 2004).”
- Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective. (2009, background): “…1997, Lapierre et al. 2005, Quine 2001, Tepper 2000, Vartia & Hyyti 2002) and life satisfaction (Tepper 2000), shame (Hallberg & Strandmark 2006, Lewis 2004), fear (Rogers & Kelloway 1997), and emotional exhaustion (Goldberg & Grandey 2007, Grandey et al. 2007, Tepper 2000, Winstanley &…”