Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the machiguenga
By Joseph Henrich. 2000
532 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6928a1908ab5ba26cda4827442e5434380555734
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Joseph Henrich
- Ernst Fehr
- Herbert Gintis
- Simon Gächter
- Urs Fischbacher
- Lee Cronk
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Colin F. Camerer
In Safety Research
- Ernst Fehr
- Joseph Henrich
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Urs Fischbacher
- Herbert Gintis
- Samuel Bowles
- Simon Gächter
- Ananish Chaudhuri
In Social Psychology
- Joseph Henrich
- Ernst Fehr
- Eric van Dijk
- Robert Boyd
- Samuel Bowles
- Colin F. Camerer
- Sarah F. Brosnan
- C. Apicella
Citations in the corpus
- Confusion or fairness in the field? Rejections in the ultimatum game under the strategy method (2006, background): “It has also been tested in a variety of environments (see, for example, Roth et al., 1991; Slonim and Roth, 1998; Cameron, 1999; Henrich, 2000; Henrich et al., 2001).”
- Foundations of Human Sociality - Economic Experiments and Ethnographic: Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (2004, methodology): “Henrich (2000) attempted to control for some of this effect by replicating the Machiguenga Ultimatum Game protocol with University of California, Los Angeles anthropology graduate students.”
- Monkeys reject unequal pay (2003, background): “Although there exists substantial cultural variation in its particulars, this ‘sense of fairness’ is probably a human universa”
- Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining (2004, background): “behavior. For example, in some cultures, like the Peruvian Machiguenga ( Henrich, 2000;”
- “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies (2005, methodology): “The Machiguenga, for example, have a mode at full defection, but lack any fully cooperative contributions, which yields a mean contribution of 22%.”
- Evolutionary Origins of the Endowment Effect: Evidence from Hunter-Gatherers (2014, background): “The closest papers to ours are the economic experiments by Henrich (2000); Henrich et al. (2001, 2006) in isolated small-scale societies; and Roth et al.’s (1991) study of bargaining behavior in four countries.”
- Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania (2009, background): “The PGG is well known within the field of experimental economics and has been applied in several cross-cultural studies (Gurven 2004; Henrich 2000).”
- Market Integration and Fairness: Evidence from Ultimatum, Dictator, and Public Goods Experiments in East Africa (2001, background): “Henrich, Joseph 2000 Ultimatum Game Bargaining among the Machiguenga: Why Culture Matters in Economic Behavior.”
- Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis (2004, background): “Henrich (2000) reports differences between 18-30 olds Machiguenga men of the Peruvian Amazon and students at UCLA, with the former offering smaller amounts than the latter.”
- The influence of cultural framing on play in the trust game: A maasai example (2007, background): “Although one of the main motivations behind the use of such games has been a desire to explore the influence of culture on behavior (e.g., Henrich, 2000), both critical and sympathetic commentators (e.g., Chibnik, 2005; Hagen & Hammerstein, 2006) have decried these studies' lack of attention to…”
- Pay what you Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism (2009, unknown): “Microeconomic experiments, such as the “ultimatum game” (Bolton 1991; Fehr and Schmidt 2003; Henrich 2000; Roth 1995), also weaken the hypothesis that consumers mostly act in a selfish and rational manner.”