Confusion or fairness in the field? Rejections in the ultimatum game under the strategy method

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature (2013, unknown): “, Paciotti and Hadley, 2003; Bahry and Wilson, 2006). Bargaining among members of different cultures is another aspect that can readily be studied in the context of the ultimatum bargaining game. For instance, Chuah et al. (2007, 2009) let Malaysian Chinese and UK subjects meet opponents of their ow”
Trust games: A meta-analysis (2011, background): “Trustees are asked to respond to every possible behavior from their counterpart, allowing the experimenter to collect more information about what the subjects might consider to be fair behavior (Bahry & Wilson, 2006).”
Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science (2010, unknown): “Similarly, work with Russian students (Grossmann, 2010) and Russian small-scale farmers (Luria 1976) showed strong tendencies for participants to group objects according to their practical functions.”
Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World (2008, background): “(2003) and Bahry and Wilson (2003) draw similar conclusions.”