Assessing metacognitive knowledge: Development and evaluation of a test instrument

By M. Händel, Cordula Artelt, S. Weinert. 2013

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/690f9837c1340b170cbaff1b1b8f310dd87594ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ai Miyamoto
2. (Mark) Feng Teng
3. Maximilian Pfost
4. Cordula Artelt

Citations in the corpus

• The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance (2020, background): “Future studies should triangulate data through a qualitative approach of observing learners’ behaviors longitudinally to obtain a full picture of learners’ metacognition (Händel, Artelt, and Weinert 2013).”
• The Relationship Between Intrinsic Motivation and Reading Comprehension: Mediating Effects of Reading Amount and Metacognitive Knowledge of Strategy Use (2019, background): “Those self-report measures are often criticized for assessing the frequency (quantity) rather than the effectiveness (quality) of the strategy us and indicating the perceived use of strategies rather than the actual use (Artelt & Schneider, 2015; Händel et al., 2013).”