Entry Mode Choice of SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe

By G. Nakos, Keith D. Brouthers. 2002

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6903fc6dedccf964d2f51043f7a4c314e7d26fe7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

SME Foreign Market Entry Mode Choice and Foreign Venture Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Experience and Product Adaptation (2017, background): “The foreign market entry mode choice determines a firm’s organizational structure when initially entering a host country market (Nakos & Brouthers, 2002).”
Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda (2014, background): “Changing an initially chosen entry mode can be costly and time-consuming (Kumar & Subramaniam, 1997), so the wrong entry mode can negatively impact the firm’s performance (Lu & Beamish, 2001; Nakos & Brouthers, 2002).”
Interpreting Results From the Multinomial Logit Model (2015, background): “Some studies find no significant difference in the choice between equity and non-equity modes (Brouthers & Nakos, 2004; Nakos & Brouthers, 2002) depending on the size of the entrant, while others have found evidence to suggest that firm size has different impacts on exporting, JV, and WOS modes…”
The Moderating Impact of Informal Institutional Distance and Formal Institutional Risk on SME Entry Mode Choice (2011, unknown): “While the dominating literature on large MNEs differentiates either between joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries or between greenfield and acquisition, studies investigating SME entry mode choice compared between equity versus non-equity modes (e.g. Brouthers and Nakos, 2004; Erramilli and D”
Boundaries of the Firm: Insights From International Entry Mode Research (2007, background): “First, Nakos and Brouthers (2002) found strong support for Dunning’s framework but found no significant difference in mode choice (equity vs. nonequity contracts) based on firm size.”
The impact of ownership (2007, background): “JV, wholly owned subsidiaries), which enable them to exercise high levels of control ( Nakos and Brouthers, 2002”
The Past and the Future of International Entrepreneurship: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field (2009, background): “…(1995) Moini (1998) Molero (1998) Moodley (2003) Mudambi and Zahra (2007) Mueller and Thomas (2000) Murrey (1996) Mutinelli and Piscitello (1998) Nakos and Brouthers (2002) Ogbuehi and Longfellow (1994) Opalinski and Good (1996) Oviatt and McDougall (1994) Oviatt and McDougall (1997) Oviatt and…”
Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† (2008, unknown): “This FDI has grown from negligible levels, thus providing an opportunity to investigate the evolution of FDI from its outset (Meyer & Peng, 2005) and includes investments by smaller firms (Nakos & Brouthers, 2002).”
SME Entry Mode Choice and Performance: A Transaction Cost Perspective (2004, methodology): “Second, past entry mode research (Pan & Tse, 2000; Kwon & Konopa, 1993; Contractor, 1984) including SME research (Nakos & Brouthers, 2002; Burgel & Murray, 2000; Erramilli & D’Souza, 1993) tends to classify modes in this way.”