The impact of ownership
By José Carlos Pinho. 2007
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c0281233e03059dfeb49804e8cd5a044d86204a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- The Internationalization of Family Firms (2014, background): “Also popular is Dunning’s eclectic paradigm (Dunning, 1980), focusing on the advantages FBs have within the three areas of Dunning’s model, namely, ownership, internalization, and location advantages (e.g., Pinho, 2007; Shapiro, Gedajlovic, & Erdener, 2003).”
- Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda (2014, background): “In addition, by increasing its involvement in foreign markets, a firm can benefit from international competition and, in consequence, become a stronger player in its home market (Pinho, 2007).”
- Family firm internationalization: heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias (2018, unknown): “To further complicate the matter, some studies found no substantive difference between internationalization levels of family versus non-family firms (Pinho, 2007; Cerrato and Piva, 2010), and other ones observed a non-linear relationship between family ownership and internationalization (Sciascia…”
- Internationalization pathways among family‐owned SMEs (2012, unknown): “However, the finding is in contrast with that of Pinho (2007), who claimed that FBs do not have a preference for indirect entry modes over direct entry modes.”