The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective
By Beverly B. Tyler. 2001
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/648bc0f7fcbab9b86f81677df27d95433b93e5e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Peter Lindelöf
- Hans Löfsten
- Daniel R. Krause
- Pankaj C. Patel
- Yonggui Wang
- Hing Po Lo
- Mingxiang Li
- Robert B. Handfield
Citations in the corpus
- The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement (2007, background): “Organizational scholars posit that alliance partners’ investments in inter-firm knowledge-sharing routines result in value creation (Dyer and Singh, 1998; Grant, 1996; Tyler, 2001).”
- Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University–Industry Links for Technology Transfer (2004, background): “Firm or capital resources are often referred to as capabilities and Tyler (2001) refers to physical, human or organizational assets that surpass similar assets of most competing firms.”
- Customer‐focused performance and the dynamic model for competence building and leveraging (2003, background): “In particular, technological competences represent an important potential source of competitive advantage in technologically competitive markets ( Tyler, 2001”
- Jack of all, master of all? CEO generalist experience and firm performance (2019, background): “…it results from a limited understanding of the interrelationships among firm competencies related to product development (West & Anderson, 1996), resource bundles (Wooldridge, Schmid, & Floyd, 2008), technology (Tyler, 2001) and organizational culture (Peterson, Smith, Martorana, & Owens, 2003).”
- Measuring inter-organizational trust—a critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003 (2007, background): “Weiss (1993) notes that studies of inter-organizational negotiations require a multiple level of analysis, as in complex social phenomena actors exist on more than one level (simultaneously), act differently as units, and influence each other across levels (see also Tyler, 2001).”