The L2 Motivational Self System and National Interest: A Pakistani perspective

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “…Ghanizadeh & Rostami (2015) 905 English Mixed Mixed M. East Intended effort Huang & Chen (2016) 1,698 English Secondary Mixed Asia Intended effort Islam et al. (2013) 975 English University Mixed M. East Intended effort Iwaniec (2014) 236 English Secondary Mixed Europe Intended effort Jiang…”
Language Learner Motivational Types: A Cluster Analysis Study (2014, background): “Several studies have shown that the ought-to L2 self exerts considerably less impact on one’s motivated behaviors than the ideal L2 self does (e.g., Islam et al., 2013; Papi, 2010; Taguchi et al., 2009).”
L2 motivational self system and willingness to communicate in the classroom and extramural digital contexts (2021, unknown): “For example, several researchers have examined an association between learners’ L2 Motivational Self System and their intended effort (Islam, Lamb, & Chambers, 2013; Khany & Amiri, 2018; Kim & Kim, 2014; Kormos et al., 2011).”
The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, background): “Languages such as English or Spanish, as well as any other symbolic system (such as mathematics and music), are symbolic cultural artefacts; they are both content and tools for thinking processes in human beings.”