Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review
By J. Archer. 2004
1,923 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54dbf01139a9f1974e70ac30fcb42dad2350744d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Andrea Campbell
- Sarah M. Coyne
- Agneta H. Fischer
- Bonnie J. Leadbeater
- Nicole H. Hess
- Edward Hagen
- Rachel S. Yeung
- E. Bates
In Health
- Agneta H. Fischer
- Andrea Campbell
- Sarah M. Coyne
- Amy M. Cohn
- Wendy L. G. Hoglund
- Jaana Juvonen
- Nicole H. Hess
- Edward Hagen
In Social Psychology
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Herbert W. Marsh
- Benjamin Nagengast
- Jaana Juvonen
- R. Craven
- Agneta H. Fischer
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- Andrea Campbell
Citations in the corpus
- Perceptions of Relational and Physical Aggression among College Students: Effects of Gender of Perpetrator, Target, and Perceiver (2007, background): “Because indirect aggression (including relational aggression) differs from direct aggression in terms of both its aims and techniques (Archer & Coyne, 2005), it is not surprising that a different gender pattern tends to be found, with females using indirect forms of aggression more frequently than t”
- Status Struggles (2011, background): “That males are more aggressive than females is virtually axiomatic for many researchers, and most empirical studies support this view (e.g., Coie and Dodge 1998), including several meta-analyses (e.g., Archer 2004; Hyde 1984).”
- Effects of masculine identity and gender role stress on aggression in men. (2006, background): “Although much effort has been directed at identifying correlates and predictors of externalizing and violent behavior, (Archer, 2004; Holtzworth-Munroe, Meehan, Herron, Rehman, & Stuart, 2004), increasing attention has focused on examining the association between components of masculine identity and”
- Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity (2018, methodology): “…groups because the use of aggressive tactics becomes a common and acceptable method to win conflicts (for male-dominant groups, see Anderson et al., 2001; Correll, 2004, and Porath et al., 2008; for female-dominant groups, see Archer, 2004; Oesterman et al., 1998, and Griskevicius et al., 2009).”
- Paths to success in young adulthood from mental health and life transitions in emerging adulthood (2010, background): “Men tend to express anger through physical and verbal aggression (Archer, 2004), whereas women tend to engage in non-explosive, noninjurious behaviors such as retreating or giving the silent treatment (Campbell & Muncer, 2008).”
- Executive function and theory of mind as predictors of aggressive and prosocial behavior and peer acceptance in early childhood (2017, background): “Though, gender differences in relational aggression may be characteristic of adolescence (Archer, 2004).”
- The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm (2008, result): “The finding that people shoot more at men than women is not surprising, and is consistent with findings that males are often seen as more threatening/dangerous (Archer, 2004; Archer & Coyne, 2005).”
- The Influence of Prior Relationship, Gender, and Fear on the Consequences of Stalking Victimization (2012, background): “Culture has an important influence on interpersonal aggression (e.g., Archer 2004 ) and the current work includes data from English-speaking countries outside of the USA.”
- Exposure to maternal vs. paternal partner violence, PTSD, and aggression in adolescent girls and boys (2006, background): “We did not specifically ask participants about opposite-sex friends; however, it is likely that their answers reflect aggression in same-sex rather than opposite-sex relationships [Archer, 2004].”
- An Integrative Approach to Understanding Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Roles of Stressors, Negative Emotions, and Moral Disengagement (2014, result): “…our hypotheses, we considered gender as a covariate for all variables, as previous studies have shown that females are more vulnerable to negative (Newmann 1986; Smith and Reise 1998), whereas males are generally more prone to deviant behavior and MD (Archer 2004; Bettencourt and Miller 1996).”
- Construct Validity of the Multidimensional Structure of Bullying and Victimization: An Application of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. (2011, methodology): “…review of gender differences in aggressive behavior, Ostrov and Godleski (2010) concluded that based on the results from two previous meta-analyses (Archer, 2004; Card et al., 2008), there is at best weak support for the gender-linked hypothesis that males engage in more physical aggression while…”
- The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength (2014, methodology): “For this reason and others, aggression will be a more important tool of social negotiation for men than women (Archer, 2004; Campbell, 2002; Daly & Wilson, 1988; Wrangham & Peterson, 1996), and both men and women should be (and are) better calibrated to assess male strength (Sell, 2012).”
- Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans (2010, background): “Men and boys are more physically aggressive than women and girls (Archer, 2004, 2009).”
- School functioning in early adolescence : Gender-linked responses to peer victimization (2007, background): “Although some research reports that girls experience significantly more relational victimization than boys and that boys experience more physical victimization than girls, these reports are inconsistent (see Archer, 2004).”