Gender Stereotypes and Women's Reports of Liking and Ability in Traditionally Masculine and Feminine Occupations

By D. Oswald. 2008

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Museology, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. N. Ellemers
2. Floor Rink
3. Michelle K. Ryan
4. B. Derks
5. David Reilly
6. David L. Neumann
7. Adina Williams
8. Manuela Barreto

In Museology

1. B. Derks
2. David Reilly
3. Floor Rink
4. David L. Neumann
5. Michelle K. Ryan
6. N. Ellemers

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

1. Adina Williams
2. Jason Aaron Edward Weston
3. Emily Dinan
4. Douwe Kiela
5. Eric Michael Smith
6. Jack Urbanek
7. B. Derks
8. Angela Fan

Citations in the corpus

• Queens Are Powerful Too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generation (2019, background): “of gender stereotype priming (Blair and Banaji, 1996; Steele and Ambady, 2006; Oswald, 2008; Derks et al., 2011; Verhaeghen et al., 2011).”
• Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this) (2012, background): “This is the case even though these women in fact find these positions highly unattractive, indicating that they are well aware of the liabilities involved in accepting such a precarious leadership position (see also Oswald, 2008; Schmader, Johns, & Forbes, 2008).”
• Gender-Role Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analytic Review (2013, background): “Highly gender typed individuals are motivated to keep their behavior and self-concept consistent with traditional gender norms (Bem1975; Bem and Lenney 1976; Maccoby 1990; Martin and Ruble 2004), and this also applies to academic domains (Nosek et al. 2002; Oswald 2008; Steffens and Jelenec 2011).”