Erratum to “The effects of self‐explaining when learning with text or diagrams”
By Shaaron E. Ainsworth, Andrea Th. Loizou. 2003
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/602b523dc76efa50753929f236cd444426cc2240
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Percival G. Matthews
- Ulana A. Luciw-Dubas
- Lindsey E. Snyder-Hogan
- Christine D. Tippett
- Jennifer G. Cromley
- Brenda A. Fonseca
- Martina A. Rau
- Michelene T. H. Chi
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Percival G. Matthews
- Michelene T. H. Chi
- Ulana A. Luciw-Dubas
- Lindsey E. Snyder-Hogan
- Jennifer G. Cromley
- Brenda A. Fonseca
- Martina A. Rau
- Christine D. Tippett
Citations in the corpus
- How to make ‘more’ better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance students’ learning about fractions (2017, background): “First, prompting students to self-explain how the visual representation corresponds to text-based explanations has been found to be effective (Ainsworth and Loizou 2003; Seufert 2003) (guideline 1.”
- What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science (2016, background): “When information is presented in two modes, the processing of that information can be distributed between the two systems, maximising memory resources (Ainsworth & Loizou, 2003; Moreno & Mayer, 2002).”
- Instruction Based on Self-Explanation (2010, background): “For example, Ainsworth and Loizou (2003) found that students presented with diagrams generated signif icantly more self-explanations and showed greater learning outcomes than students presented with the material in a text-only format. Further, Butcher (2006) found that simple diagrams led to more in”
- Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams (2010, background): “A handful of studies comparing students’ cognitive processes in text vs. diagrams have found that students make more inferences in diagrams than in running text (Ainsworth & Loizou, 2003; Butcher, 2006; Moore & Scevak, 1997).”