Validity of High‐Stakes Assessment: Are Students Engaged in Complex Thinking?
By Suzanne Lane. 2005
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ff2eef8e48bcd5e0f0b9a1b0cf3e3a586f3085a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ou Lydia Liu
- Marcia C. Linn
- John Blackmore
- Jihyun Hwang
- Lois Frankel
- C. Brew
- Ellen A. Skinner
- Libby F. Gerard
In Education
- Ou Lydia Liu
- Lois Frankel
- Marcia C. Linn
- Emily Saxton
- John Blackmore
- Jihyun Hwang
- Robin J. Burns
- C. Brew
In Information Systems and Management
Citations in the corpus
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MATHEMATICAL LITERACY AND OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF MATHEMATICAL TASKS (2021, background): “This is possibly because of the assumption that large-scale assessments are designed to evaluate students’ content knowledge, not their mathematical practices (Lane, 2004).”
- Automated Scoring of Constructed-Response Science Items: Prospects and Obstacles (2014, background): “Both science education researchers (e.g., Lane, 2004; Shepard, 2000) and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS; National Research Council, 2012) stress that scientific explanation is a critical component of science education.”
- Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-14-10. (2014, background): “Research has long established that the ability to recognize is different from the ability to generate (Frederiksen, 1984; Lane, 2004; Shepard, 2000).”
- A Common Measurement System for K-12 STEM education: Adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking (2014, background): “Niemi, & Baker, 2007; Lane, 2004). The exact design and implementation of performance-based work sample tasks, however, are extremely relevant to the validity of these assessment instruments. Shavelson, Baxter, and Gao (1993) report that rater and task both pose threats to reliability and that measu”