Measuring Technological Capability and Performance
By Joseph E. Coombs, Paul E. Bierly III. 2006
382 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f0607404ca006aa31ee4f11cfe9c4f60d005e39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Jason L. Dedrick
- Kenneth L. Kraemer
- P. Jaskiewicz
- Rune Bysted
- Tatiana Andreeva
- Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia
- Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio
- Jaider Vega-Jurado
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- P. Jaskiewicz
- Tatiana Andreeva
- Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia
- Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio
- Jaider Vega-Jurado
- A. Villar-López
- Jason L. Dedrick
- Danny Miller
In Strategy and Management
- Kenneth L. Kraemer
- Jason L. Dedrick
- P. Jaskiewicz
- Rune Bysted
- Tatiana Andreeva
- Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia
- Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio
- Jaider Vega-Jurado
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance (2014, background): “Schumpeter (1934) and other important innovation researchers such as Damanpour (Damanpour, 1991; Damanpour & Evan, 1984) and Edquist, Hommen andMcKelvey (2001) have classified innovation types in several ways.”
- Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context (2016, background): “Third, they mostly used financial proxies for estimating the elements of IC, although such proxies have been criticized as not accurately reflecting the real situation in a company (Coombs and Bierly, 2006).”
- Economic and Technological Importance of Innovations in Large Family and Founder Firms (2013, methodology): “We shall use patent citations as a proxy for the economic and technological importance of innovation output (Coombs & Bierly, 2006; Hall et al., 2005; Harhoff et al., 1999; Harhoff, Scherer, & Vopel, 2003; Trajtenberg, 1990) in family, founder, and other firms.”
- Exploring Managerial Mechanisms that Influence Innovative Work Behaviour: Comparing private and public employees (2014, background): “2000) and/or through employee competence development (Coombs and Bierly 2006).”
- Analyzing the determinants of firm§s absorptive capacity: beyond R&D (2008, positive): “What is certain, however, is that a firm’s R&D activities strengthen its technological trajectory in a given knowledge field, and make it more receptive to the relevant external knowledge (Veugelers, 1997; Coombs and Bierly, 2006).”
- Value Capture in the Global Electronics Industry: Empirical Evidence for the “Smiling Curve” Concept (2012, background): “While resources include firms’ tangible and intangible assets, capabilities refer to a firm’s ability to appropriately deploy, coordinate and integrate its resources for production (Grant, 1991; Teece et al., 1997; Coombs and Bierly, 2006).”