A General Dynamic Capability: Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry?*
By Alfred A. Marcus, Marc H. Anderson. 2006
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ef1e926445cd02bc752de7a5550719d020f090d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Ante Glavas
- Ilídio Barreto
- Marcus Wagner
- Patrick Llerena
- Justin B. Craig
- Herman Aguinis
- Taina Eriksson
In Marketing
- Herman Aguinis
- Ante Glavas
- Clay Dibrell
- E. Hansen
- Ilídio Barreto
- Marcus Wagner
- Patrick Llerena
- Justin B. Craig
In Strategy and Management
- Ante Glavas
- Herman Aguinis
- Clay Dibrell
- E. Hansen
- Ilídio Barreto
- Marcus Wagner
- Patrick Llerena
- Justin B. Craig
Citations in the corpus
- Natural Environment, Market Orientation, and Firm Innovativeness: An Organizational Life Cycle Perspective (2011, background): “Second, because the firms in this industry deal with products for human consumption, safety, quality, and consistency are critical components of a firm’s reputation (Marcus and Anderson 2006).”
- The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, unknown): “…models Malik & Kotabe (2009) Quantitative OLS regression Analysis of model of the dynamic capability development mechanisms in emerging markets Marcus & Anderson (2006) Quantitative Regression Investigation of whether a general dynamic capability affects both firms' skills in supply chain…”
- How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR–Financial Performance Relationship (2012, unknown): “As a result, the more difficult it is for a firm engaging in less-related or even unrelated CSR activities to improve its financial performance (Marcus and Anderson, 2006).”
- Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future (2010, methodology): “…propensity is relevant only if the organization also has the propensity to sense opportunities and threats (Gilbert, 2006; Teece, 2007), and a reconfiguration propensity achieves a high effect only when combined with a propensity to make market-oriented decisions (Menguc & Auh, 2006).”
- The Essence of Dynamic Capabilities and their Measurement (2018, unknown): “(2015), Malik and Kotabe (2009), Marcus and Anderson (2006), McKelvie and Davidsson (2009), Schilke and Goerzen (2010), Slater et al .”
- What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, background): “An alignment of CSR with firm mission and values is an important predictor of CSR (Bansal, 2003; Maignan et al., 1999; Marcus & Anderson, 2006).”
- Eco-Innovation Through Integration, Regulation and Cooperation: Comparative Insights from Case Studies in Three Manufacturing Sectors (2011, methodology): “In particular, organizational learning can be understood as a dynamic capability (Teece et al., 1997; Marcus and Anderson, 2006) that helps to develop new or adapt existing capabilities that improve corporate responses to regulation for example in terms of the innovation offsets proposed in the…”