Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review

By William Ho. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008

1,227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5eb40dbde1acfb7286fafa1f3923be7ef4162d2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process (2011, methodology): “Several other methods have been proposed to measure consistency. Peláez and Lamata (2003) describe a method based on the determinant of the matrix. Crawford and Williams (1985) prefer to sum the difference between the ratio of the calculated priorities and the given comparisons in the Geometric Cons”
Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 (2015, methodology): “Several studies (Behzadian, Kazemzadeh, Albadvi, & Aghdasi, 2010; Ho, 2008; Vaidya & Kumar, 2006) have demonstrated the vitality of the field and reported several methods proposed in the literature.”
An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach (2012, background): “For more details about FAHP, you can refer to Kahraman et al. (2003) and Ho (2008).”
Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 (2015, methodology): “Several studies (Behzadian, Kazemzadeh, Albadvi, & Aghdasi, 2010; Ho, 2008; Vaidya & Kumar, 2006) have demonstrated the vitality of the field and reported several methods proposed in the literature.”
State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods (2014, methodology): “Ishizaka, Labib (2011) and Ho (2008) publications were devoted to the analysis of AHP method.”
Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future (2011, methodology): “Also a review of integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications with SWOT has been done by Ho (2008).”
SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review (2021, background): “Ho (2008) studied a review of integrated analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and its applications with SWOT.”
The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach (2013, background): “Ho (2008) reviews the applications of the integrated AHPs from 1997 to 2006 and finds the five methodologies that most frequently integrate with the AHP are mathematical programming, quality function deployment, metaheuristics, SWOT analysis, and data envelopment analysis.”
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations (2009, methodology): “Along with its traditional applications, a new trend, as compiled by the work of Ho (2008), is to use AHP in conjunction with others methods: mathematical programming techniques like linear programming, Data Envelopment Analysis, Fuzzy Sets, House of Quality, Genetic Algorithms, Neural Networks,…”
Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications (2016, neutral): “Each sub-problem is a single objective decision making problem that can be solved quite easily (Vaidya and Kumar, 2006; Ho, 2008; Ho et al., 2012; Subramanian and Ramanathan, 2012; Rajesha and Malligab, 2013).”
When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators (2017, neutral): “Benefit of the doubt approach The benefit of the doubt approach (BOD) is an application of data envelopment analysis (DEA) (Nardo et al., 2005).”
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications (2012, background): “A number of literature review papers, i.e., Behzadian, Kazemzadeh, Aghdasi, and Albadvi (2010) on PROMETHEE and Vaidya and Kumar (2006) and Ho (2008) on AHP, show the vitality of the field and the many methods that have been developed.”
The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process (2017, methodology): “Because Ho (2008) observed in his literature review article that integrated AHP can result in a more realistic and promising decision than a stand-alone AHP, we focus only on integrated AHP approaches and conduct a follow-up literature review study to Ho (2008) to explore the new trends and…”
A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions (2018, methodology): “An in-depth knowledge and analysis is provided in Ho (2008) for AHP, Kubler et al. (2016) for FAHP, Behzadian et al. (2012) for TOPSIS/FTOPSIS, Gul et al. (2016) for VIKOR/ FVIKOR.”