The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach
By Thomas L. Saaty. Operational Research, 2013
463 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fb4f31ddad18c56a41d0e69109b2a5b9bac9cb4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Xin Ma
- Yong Deng
- William Ho
- Sankaran Mahadevan
- Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga
- Felix Tung Sun Chan
- Madjid Tavana
- Mehdi Soltanifar
Citations in the corpus
- Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution (2021, background): “For additional intuition regarding synthesis modes, see Saaty (2006, 2013).”
- A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes (2018, unknown): “At the present moment (2018), about 100 different methods are in circulation [22].”
- A Threat Assessment Model under Uncertain Environment (2015, background): “Saaty [1, 2] introduces theAHPwhich is amulticriteria decision-making approach in which factors are arranged in a hierarchic structure.”
- Supplier selection based on evidence theory and analytic network process (2016, background): “Since then, DS/AHP has received great attention.(11,69) Although there are abundant literatures about the selection of suitable supplier, to the authors’ knowledge, there were relatively few works which combined DS evidence theory and ANP to deal with this problem.”
- The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process (2017, methodology): “…which x 3 dominates x 4 , then the vector of priorities w should be such that not only w ( x 1 ) > w ( x 2 ) and w ( x 3 ) > w ( x 4 ) (preservation of order of preference) but also that w ( x 1 ) / w ( x 2 ) > w ( x 3 ) / w ( x 4 ) (preservation of order of intensity of preference)” (Saaty, 2013).”