State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods
By Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Zenonas Turskis, Simona Kildiene. 2014
833 citations recorded by the source corpus.
AbstractDecision-making is primarily a process that involves different actors: people, groups of people, institutions and the state. As a discipline, multi-criteria decision-making has a relatively short history. Since 1950s and 1960s, when foundations of modern multi-criteria decision-making methods have been laid, many researches devoted their time to development of new multi-criteria decision-making models and techniques. In the past decades, researches and development in the field have accelerated and seem to continue growing exponentially. Despite the intensive development worldwide, few attempts have been made to systematically present the theoretical bases and developments of multi-criteria decision-making methods. However, the methodological choices and framework for assessment of decisions are still under discussion. The article describes the situation with reviews of MCDM/MADM methods. Furthermore, there is a need for research to study the strengths and weaknesses of different decision-making me...
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d1aa2b6ea7ce9295eb4b1a821b58ec323990297
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Abbas Mardani
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Zenonas Turskis
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Dragisa Stanujkic
- Khalil Md Nor
- Kannan Govindan
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Abbas Mardani
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Z. Khalifah
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Khalil Md Nor
- Zenonas Turskis
- Alireza Valipour
- N. Zakwan
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Abbas Mardani
- Zenonas Turskis
- Ahmad Jusoh
- E. Lozano-Mínguez
- Athanasios Kolios
- Konstantinos Salonitis
- Varvara Mytilinou
Citations in the corpus
- A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs (2016, methodology): “A study that focused on earlier applications of MCDM methods demonstrated that developing fuzzy MCDM methods is the upcoming trend [46].”
- Scientific Decision Framework for Evaluation of Renewable Energy Sources under Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Set with Partially Known Weight Information (2019, methodology): “Further, a comprehensive review was made on different ranking methods, and it was inferred that the COPRAS ranking method was simple, effective, and rational for various MAGDM problems [32].”
- Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 (2015, methodology): “…theories (assumptions about values or preferences and structured representations of values or preferences); Assessment methodologies (elicitation, estimation and scaling of individuals’ preferences, utilities and subjective probabilities in MCDM situations) (Fishburn, 1978; Zavadskas et al., 2014).”
- THE USE OF THE PIVOT PAIRWISE RELATIVE CRITERIA IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF CRITERIA (2018, methodology): “Therefore, the result of rapid development has led to the creation of many MCDM methods (Mardani et al. 2015, Zavadskas et al. 2014,”