Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process

By Alessio Ishizaka, Ashraf Labib. Expert systems with applications, 2011

1,319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d9b9b31d523b7ea6dce1b53b9d4a503e06ea144

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Information Systems

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution (2021, background): “…science, healthcare, and education for applications from human exploration of Mars (Tavana, 2004, 2006) to selection of new production facilities (Ishizaka & Labib, 2011b), organizational evaluation (Ghamarietal.,2017),forestmanagement(Darvishietal.,2020;Zandebasiri&Pourhashemi,…”
Cloud computing service composition: A systematic literature review (2014, methodology): “Next, the phases of the proposed algorithm (SSUP) include generating and normalizing a user requirement matrix, generating a QoS weight specification using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Jeonghwan, Rothrock, McDermott, & Barnes, 2010), generating and normalizing the service attribute matrix, ”
CLUSTERS AND PIVOTS FOR EVALUATING A LARGE NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES IN AHP (2012, background): “The rank reversal problem (Belton & Gear, 1983) has been much debated but never fully resolved, see a review in (Ishizaka & Labib, 2009; Ishizaka & Labib, 2011).”
A GIS-AHP combination for the sites assessment of large-scale CSP plants with dry and wet cooling systems. Case study: Eastern Morocco (2018, methodology): “Usually, to solve this type of problem, researchers and decision makers use the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods (Ishizaka and Labib, 2011; Cristóbal and Ramón, 2012).”
Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP (2014, methodology): “Other scholars have suggested new judgment scales or they expand the method by fuzzy logic and group decision making (Ishizaka & Labib, 2011).”
SPEI-Based Approach to Agricultural Drought Monitoring in Vojvodina Region (2019, background): “However, it is important to bear in mind that consistency must be checked, because priorities make sense only when the comparison matrix is consistent or near consistent [59].”
Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model (2020, methodology): “The most popular technique to ﬁnd the optimal weight for the AIP is the arithmetic mean [25] (for other techniques of aggregation, see, for instance [26] ).”
The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis (2017, background): “The literature contains several important surveys (Chai et al., 2013; Ho, 2008; Ishizaka and Labib, 2011; Sipahi and Timor, 2010), but the present paper is the first”
Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process (2014, background): “AHP aids decision-maker facing complex problems with multiple conflicting and subjective criteria (location or investment selection, projects ranking, etc.) (Ishizaka and Labib 2011).”