Parent and Child Perspectives on the Presence and Meaning of Parental Television Mediation

By Amy I. Nathanson. 2001

348 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e78bb673e3aa8c56bcc49a1d8dc6fd4db0e06c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Social Interaction and Co-Viewing With YouTube: Blending Mass Communication Reception and Social Connection (2009, background): “In prior research, co-viewing has been studied in the context of parents helping their children understand and be more literate about content (eg, Nathanson, 2001 ).”
“Media Time = Family Time” (2014, background): “Although much research has focused on this construct under the general umbrella of “active mediation” (e.g., Nathanson, 2001), these responses provide a richer view of what adolescents and parents actually talk about concerning the media and what they feel is important.”
Determinants of Internet Mediation: (2013, background): “Types of Mediation Most studies on parental guidance of television viewing and video gaming distinguish three separate mediation strategies (Nathanson, 2001; Nikken & Jansz, 2006; Journal of Children and Media, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2013 ISSN 1748-2798 print/1748-2801 online/13/010096-113 q 2013 Taylor &…”
Reducing Harm From Media: A Meta-Analysis of Parental Mediation (2019, background): “Research on the effectiveness of co-using has produced mixed results (Nathanson, 2001b).”
Surveying Parental Mediation: Connections, Challenges and Questions for Media Literacy (2009, background): “[and that] parents who enforce rules have an inherent dislike of violent content for themselves [emphasis in original]” (Nathanson 2001b, 214).”
Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use (2008, background): “Whichever is the case, it appears that whether children themselves recognize a rule to be in place matters more than the parents’ view that they have issued such a prohibition (c.f. Fujioka & Austin, 2003; Nathanson, 2001a).”
Parental Co-Use of Media Technology with their Young Children in the USA (2015, background): “Of the three types of mediation, coviewing has the least clarity in the literature (Nathanson, 2001).”
Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children (2006, methodology): “They also discussed program content more often with their children (Bybee et al., 1982; Van der Voort et al., 1992, 1998; Nathanson, 2001a).”
Perceived Media Influence and Efficacy as Predictors of Caregivers' Protective Behaviors (2002, background): “The more active responses, such as active mediation, seem to promote the most positive outcomes (Nathanson, 2001 a); however, parents are more likely to use the more passive responses, such as restrictive mediation (Austin, 1993; Bybee, Robinson, & Turow, 1982).”
The Unintended Effects of Parental Mediation of Television on Adolescents (2002, background): “In fact, Nathanson (2001b) found that coviewing was interpreted among children to mean that parents liked and approved of the material.”
Do You See What I See? Parent and Child Reports of Parental Monitoring of Media (2012, background): “Active mediation involves parent-child conversations about the media and its content (Austin, 1993, 2001; Chakroff & Nathanson, 2008; Nathanson, 2001a), and has been referred to as instructive guidance, discussion, and explanation (Bybee, Robinson, & Turow, 1982; Livingstone & Helsper, 2008; van…”