Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children

By Peter Nikken, Jeroen Jansz. 2006

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65b94eb8190222869c905d1cd61a77e14ef5d31a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Surveying Parental Mediation: Connections, Challenges and Questions for Media Literacy (2009, background): “…be applied to other forms of media, the majority of mediation research is limited to television, with emerging research on video game mediation (Nikken and Jansz 2006) and Internet mediation (Eastin, Greenberg, and Hofschire 2006; Lee and Chae 2007; Livingstone and Helsper 2008; Youn 2008).”
Harm and Offence in Media Content: A Review of the Evidence (2006, background): “In relation to parental mediation of video-games, three similar types of strategies have been found – ‘restrictive mediation’, ‘active mediation’ and ‘co-playing’ (Nikken and Jansz, 2006).”
Parental Influences on Pathological Symptoms of Video-Gaming Among Children and Adolescents: A Prospective Study (2014, background): “A few studies have evidenced that higher parental restriction on digital media use is exercised for girls than for boys (Nikken and Jansz 2006; van den Eijnden et al. 2010).”
Parental Co-Use of Media Technology with their Young Children in the USA (2015, background): “However, little research has examined parental mediation in younger children’s computer use (Nikken & Jansz, 2014) or video game play (Nikken & Jansz, 2006), and there is a dearth of research examining parent–child mediation of devices such as tablets or smartphones.”
A Qualitative Inquiry into the Contextualized Parental Mediation Practices of Young Children’s Digital Media Use at Home (2016, background): “Our notion of co-use is in line with previous work (e.g., Nikken & Jansz, 2006; 2014; Valkenburg et al., 1999) in that we also found that positive motivations like seeking shared media enjoyment can induce co-use.”
Parental Mediation Of Children's Internet Use In Different European Countries (2009, background): “…the large body of knowledge concerning parental mediation of older media such as TV and video games (Borzekowski & Robinson, 2007; Lemish, 2008; Nikken & Jansz, 2006; Journal of Children and Media, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2009 ISSN 1748-2798 print/1748-2801 online/09/040394-409 q 2009 Taylor & Francis…”
Determinants of Internet Mediation: (2013, methodology): “Compared to children, parents are generally less aware of the content of games, television programmes, and children’s online activities, which may lead to more concerns about unwanted media effects and a greater need to apply mediation (Livingstone & Bovill, 2001; Nikken & Jansz, 2006).”
Do You See What I See? Parent and Child Reports of Parental Monitoring of Media (2012, background): “Although restrictive mediation is also positively related to education (Brown et al., 1990; Valkenburg et al., 1999), it is the preferred monitoring choice among low-income parents (Nikken & Jansz, 2006; Warren, 2005).”
Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use (2008, positive): “It is noteworthy that in relation to parental mediation of video games, three similar types of strategies have been found—‘‘restrictive mediation,’’ ‘‘active mediation,’’ and ‘‘co-playing’’ (Nikken & Jansz, 2006).”
CHILDREN AND ONLINE RISK (2009, background): “In support of this growing resilience, parents may need a closer understanding of their child's perception of online risks and appropriate coping strategies (Livingstone & Bober 2006 ; Nikken & Kansz 2006 , Staksrud 2008 ; Wilson et al.”
Developing and Validating the Perceived Parental Media Mediation Scale: A Self‐Determination Perspective (2013, background): “…for example, that both restrictive and active mediation are more common among families with (a) younger children (e.g., Hoffner & Buchanan, 2002; Nikken & Jansz, 2006), Corresponding author: Patti M. Valkenburg; e-mail: p.m.valkenburg@uva.nl Human Communication Research 39 (2013) 445–469 © 2013…”
Associations between child mobile use and digital parenting style in Hungarian families (2019, background): “Therefore, authoritarian parents use restrictive mediation and supervision (Nikken & Jansz, 2006).”
Rules? Role Model? Relationship? The Impact of Parents on Their Children’s Problematic Mobile Phone Involvement (2019, background): “…correspond to the finding that parents who perceive greater risks in media use (which they probably do if they see their children’s mobile phone involvement as problematic), engage more in (particularly restrictive) parental mediation (e.g., Duerager & Livingstone, 2012; Nikken & Jansz, 2006).”