The Unintended Effects of Parental Mediation of Television on Adolescents

By Amy I. Nathanson. 2002

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5990960e6fd32471a9e1e354cd679e8c16d89ddd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Effects of the SMART Classroom Curriculum to Reduce Child and Family Screen Time (2006, unknown): “Some employ ‘‘restrictive mediation’’; that is, parents forbid their children from watching certain programs, control viewing to certain times and limit the length of their children’s TV viewing (Nathanson, 2002).”
Surveying Parental Mediation: Connections, Challenges and Questions for Media Literacy (2009, background): “For instance, children of parents who use active mediation learn more from educational television content and experience positive outcomes on social behavior (Nathanson 2002).”
The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework (2009, background): “Parental restrictions on adolescent media use were also related to more positive feelings about the restricted content and more negative attitudes toward their relationship with their parents (Nathanson, 2002).”
Reducing Harm From Media: A Meta-Analysis of Parental Mediation (2019, background): “Research by Nathanson (2002) indicated that restrictive mediation was related to more positive attitudes toward television violence and sex as well as the viewing of such content.”
Parental Co-Use of Media Technology with their Young Children in the USA (2015, background): “Factors that may determine whether coviewing has a negative or positive effect include the appropriateness of the content (Nathanson, 1999, 2002), the degree to which the content encourages interaction (Fisch et al., 2008; Lemish & Rice, 1986; Nathanson & Rasmussen, 2011), whether coviewing is…”
The role of parents in problematic internet use among us adolescents (2016, background): “co-viewing TV can increase negative effects of unfavorable content if children perceive parents to be condoning the onscreen behaviors (Nathanson, 2002)).”
Parental Mediation Theory for the Digital Age (2011, unknown): “…that among adolescents , restrictive mediation was related to less positive attitudes toward parents, more positive attitudes toward the forbidden content, and a greater likelihood that the adolescents experiencing restrictive mediation would view the content with their peers (Nathanson, 2002).”
Rules? Role Model? Relationship? The Impact of Parents on Their Children’s Problematic Mobile Phone Involvement (2019, unknown): “Co-use refers to parents’ and children’s joint media use (e.g., Clark, 2011; Livingstone, Haddon, Görzig, & Ólafsson, 2011; Livingstone & Helsper, 2008; Nathanson, 2002; Sonck, Nikken, & De Haan, 2013; Shin, 2015; Valkenburg et al., 2013).”