Social Interaction and Co-Viewing With YouTube: Blending Mass Communication Reception and Social Connection

By Paul M. Haridakis, Gary Hanson. 2009

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/958a80ce8083a5f1793525e580ec868b38d11e4e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

In their own words: What bothers children online? (2014, background): “It is important to examine the social practices associated with the children’s peer exchange of decontextualised pornographic and violent clips on YouTube and other video-sharing sites (as is underway for adults: Burgess and Green, 2009; Haridakis and Hanson, 2009).”
Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media (2013, background): “Similarly, Haridakis, & Hansen (2009) used the pre-existing measures of Internet gratifications (identified by Papacharissi, & Rubin, 2000) and television viewing (Rubin, 1983) and found that people view and share YouTube videos for convenient entertainment, interpersonal connection, convenient info”
Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? (2017, methodology): “Haridakis and Hanson (2009) employed the U&G framework to understand YouTube motivations in terms of viewing and sharing.”
Why Do We Indulge? Exploring Motivations for Binge Watching (2018, background): “Social interaction has also been found to be a primary motivation for using YouTube (Haridakis & Hanson, 2009; Shao, 2009) and mobile phones (Leung & Wei, 2000).”
Uses and Gratifications of Problematic Social Media Use Among University Students: a Simultaneous Examination of the Big Five of Personality Traits, Social Media Platforms, and Social Media Use Motives (2018, background): “…identified in the literature include social interaction, information seeking, entertainment, passing time, relaxation, communication, convenience, surveillance or knowledge about others, and self-status seeking (Alhabash and Ma 2017; Haridakis and Hanson 2009; Khan 2017; Whiting and Williams 2013).”
Binge-watching motivates change: Uses and gratifications of streaming video viewers challenge traditional TV research (2020, methodology): “For example, Haridakis and Hanson (2009) considered YouTube as social media and found that people use YouTube for its convenience in entertainment seeking and information seeking.”
Influences on TV Viewing and Online User-shared Video Use: Demographics, Generations, Contextual Age, Media Use, Motivations, and Audience Activity (2012, background): “A feature of many social networking sites (SNS) is the ability to post and share videos and links to videos (see Haridakis & Hanson, 2009; Madden, 2009; Purcell, 2010; Traffikd, 2011).”
Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics (2015, background): “…pastime, surveillance, news quizzes Chang et al. (2006) Online games Companionship, action, substitution for friends, passing time, popularity Haridakis and Hanson (2009) Video-sharing website Convenient, entertainment, convenient information, co-viewing, social interaction Quan-Haase and…”
The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach (2015, background): “…exactly mean the same on an individual level: “while people watch videos on YouTube for some of the same reasons identified in studies of television viewing, there is a distinctly social aspect to YouTube use that reflects its social networking characteristics” (Haridakis and Hanson, 2009: 317).”