Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research

By Daniel Robey, Marie-Claude Boudreau, Gregory M. Rose. 2000

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e58fe838614e5aa581abb4e4d1894f27a5f753c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions (2002, background): “…1998; Watson 1994), or descriptive studies and reviews (Amaravadi et al. 1992; Jones 1995; Maletz 1990; Mann et al. 1991; Mykytyn et al. 1990; Robey et al. 2000; Sarker and Lee 1999; Tuomi 1999/2000) were not coded because absent a theoretical lens and/or an interpretation of empirical data,…”
Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: an Integrative Role for Learning?* (2008, background): “As stated by Robey, Boudreau and Rose (2000, p. 139): ‘Information technologies are subject to complex social processes as they are implemented and used in organizations; they are not plugged in and played without the involvement of numerous actors over signiﬁcant periods of time.’”
Exploring CRM effectiveness: an institutional theory perspective (2011, background): “Research in the field of information systems shows that information technology may enhance the flow of information within an organization, making it easier to store customer data and increasing information accessibility (Alavi and Leidner 2001; Robey et al. 2000).”
The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction (2007, background): “Alternatively, theory indicates that once use of the system becomes routine or habitual, users are less likely to do this (Robey et al. 2000).”
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002, positive): “Robey et al. (2000) present another admirable example of reviewing two major streams of research to inform their research topic.”
A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research (2006, background): “Although most buzzwords appear and disappear from the literature over time, the underlying theories and theoretical constructs are more stable ( Robey, Boudreau, & Rose, 2000 ).”
Knowledge management technologies and applications - literature review from 1995 to 2002 (2003, neutral): “and Robey et al. (2000)”
Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change (2002, background): “Consultants operated as intermediaries who facilitated organizational learning by bringing in external knowledge [3, 49].”
Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes (2007, positive): “An emerging research area in the information systems (IS) field focuses on the application of advanced IT tools to support the underlying processes of knowledge sharing and organizational memory (Alavi and Leidner 2001, Sambamurthy and Subramani 2005, Robey et al. 2000).”
Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective (2005, methodology): “Data Analysis Data analysis was based on three types of coding suggested by Strauss and Corbin (1990): open, axial, and selective coding.”
A critical analysis of decision support systems research (2005, neutral): “This style of research (Robey et al ., 2000), ‘literature review and analysis’ (Alavi and Leidner, 2001), ‘survey’ (Malone and Crowston, 1994), and the term we adopted, ‘literature analysis’ (Pervan, 1998).”