Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others
By G. Moskowitz. 2004
326 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e3e3dc3fb4750741aeb2e79335dcfdd7b433749
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Hannah
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Mary Uhl‐Bien
- Fred Walumbwa
- Fabrice L. Cavarretta
- Camiel J. Beukeboom
- M. Hogg
- Christian Burgers
Citations in the corpus
- Listening Competence in Initial Interactions I: Distinguishing Between What Listening Is and What Listeners Do (2012, background): “…theories of listening begins with an assumption now considered axiomatic in the social cognitive literature: when “people encounter novel phenomena, they generate plausible hypotheses to account for them and make them understandable” (Hewes & Planalp, 1987, p. 152; for review see Moskowitz, 2005).”
- Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project (2022, unknown): “More agreement was observed when the quote was attributed to Jefferson than Lenin (reported in Moskowitz, 2004).”
- Morality and competence in person- and self-perception (2005, background): “Benefits and costs brought by traits to their possessors and persons who interact with them seem to practically exhaust antecedents of the trait valence.”
- How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework (2019, background): “An abundance of research has demonstrated the pervasive and fundamental role of social categorization and stereotypes in social perception, judgment, and interaction (Allport, 1954; Mackie, Hamilton, Susskind, & Rosselli, 1996; Moskowitz, 2005; Dovidio, Hewstone, Glick, & Esses, 2010).”
- The Multiple-Category Problem: Category Activation and Inhibition in the Hiring Process (2007, background): “If low prejudice individuals habitually pursue goals of fairness and equality toward a particular group, the cumulative practice of detecting and reject ing stereotypes can make the cognitive activi ties associated with inhibiting categories rou tine (Monteith, Sherman, & Devine, 1998; Moskowitz, 20”
- Uncertain Self in a Changing World: A Foundation for Radicalisation, Populism, and Autocratic Leadership (2020, background): “Because people are strategic in how they allocate their limited cognitive resources (e.g. Fiske & Taylor, 2017; Moskowitz, 2005), they expend cognitive energy resolving only those uncertainties that are important to them.”
- Mechanisms of linguistic bias: How words reflect and maintain stereotypic expectancies (2014, background): “To have – and share – such stable expectancies about people and social categories is often highly functional (Moskowitz, 2005).”
- Social Transmission Bias and Investor Behavior (2021, unknown): “…that extreme cues tend to be more salient than moderate cues and therefore are more often noticed and encoded for later retrieval (Fiske (1980), Moskowitz (2004), and Morewedge, Gilbert, and Wilson (2005)).8 Many behavioral finance models of investor behavior assume overextrapolation of either…”
- Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice (2006, background): “In contrast, a thirsty person, who may already have been contemplating getting a drink, should be more likely to choose a (thirst-quenching) beverage that (due to priming) is highly accessible than one that is less accessible (for similar reasoning, see Moskowitz, 2005).”
- A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts (2009, background): “Such variance, biases, and errors in perceptions and attributions are well established in the social cognition literature (e.g., Moskowitz, 2005; Fiske, 1991; Nisbett & Ross, 1980; Tversky & Kahneman, 1982) so for space limitations we will not treat the expansive literature here.”