A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment: General victimization and bully/victim problems among German schoolchildren
By Mechthild Schäfer, Nicole E. Werner, Nicki R. Crick. 2002
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biotechnology, Plant Science, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e1d73081f40a26932a2855b846891b299d650f4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biotechnology
In Plant Science
In Social Psychology
- Amanda J. Rose
- Anthony A. Volk
- K. Rudolph
- Z. Marini
- Andrew V. Dane
- Felix C. Brodbeck
- Dieter Wolke
- Lisa Wagner
Citations in the corpus
- A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. (2006, methodology): “, Galen & Underwood, 1997), methodology or informant (e.g., Paquette & Underwood, 1999; Schafer et al., 2002), or social characteristics (e.”
- What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. (2014, background): “Indeed, Schafer, Werner, and Crick (2002) highlight the absence of a power imbalance in general measures of aggression and victimization as a strength that allows for the detection of potentially harmful aggression between individuals of relatively equal power (e.g., Faris & Felmlee, 2014).”
- Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school (2005, background): “Moreover, for secondary school it is evidenced that peer and self-reported bullying roles increasingly overlap (Schäfer et al., 2002).”