KNOWLEDGE OF NONVERBAL CUES, GENDER, AND NONVERBAL DECODING ACCURACY
By Janelle C. Rosip, Judith A. Hall. 2004
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5db5eb0c308c766d3c8475d2a9dc6ddee401642c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jane O'Reilly
- Sharon L. O’Sullivan
- Joan Meyers-Levy
- Bilge Mutlu
- François Chiocchio
- B. Loken
- Silvia Bonaccio
In Social Psychology
- Jane O'Reilly
- Sharon L. O’Sullivan
- Joan Meyers-Levy
- Bilge Mutlu
- François Chiocchio
- Daniel J. Szafir
- B. Loken
- Silvia Bonaccio
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jane O'Reilly
- Sharon L. O’Sullivan
- Joan Meyers-Levy
- Bilge Mutlu
- Vijay Chidambaram
- François Chiocchio
- B. Loken
- Silvia Bonaccio
Citations in the corpus
- Country-Specific Associations Made by Consumers: A Dual-Coding Theory Perspective (2013, unknown): “…10 Hugo Boss 0 2 3 5 10 IKEA 3 2 4 1 10 Interio 2 2 1 5 10 Kia 8 1 1 0 10 Lufthansa 2 2 2 4 10 Ralph Lauren 1 0 3 6 10 Red Bull 2 1 4 4 11 Ryanair 2 2 1 5 10 XXXLutz 2 0 4 4 10 Country-Specific Associations Made by Consumers 109 cues (Hall 1978; Hall, Carter, and Horgan 2000; Rosip and Hall 2004).”
- Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead☆ (2015, background): “…seems to explain why, compared to males, females more accurately detect and interpret subtle nonverbal cues (e.g., body language, paralanguage; Rosip & Hall, 2004), scan more data (i.e., perform more eye fixations), producing a recognition advantage (Heisz, Pottruff, & Shore, 2013), engage in…”
- Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement (2012, background): “In addition, females rated the instructor with high immediacy more favorably, consistent with previous findings on gender-based differences in social perception, which indicate that females in general are better able to decode and more sensitive to nonverbal cues [42].”
- Designing persuasive robots: How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues (2012, background): “This hypothesis builds on the finding that women are more adept than men at reading nonverbal cues [24, 45].”
- Nonverbal Behavior and Communication in the Workplace (2016, methodology): “Test of Nonverbal Cue Knowledge (Rosip & Hall, 2004): Individual differences in knowledge of meaning and use of nonverbal cues assessed via an 81-item true/false test.”