Designing persuasive robots: How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues

By Vijay Chidambaram, Yueh-Hsuan Chiang, Bilge Mutlu. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2012

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccd03bfa9ac25c8326bc9e95fb4fa4f672bd1c0f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Tal Oron-Gilad
2. Brian Scassellati
3. Henny Admoni
4. Shanee Honig
5. Cynthia Lynn Breazeal

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Tal Oron-Gilad
2. Shanee Honig

Citations in the corpus

• Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction (2017, background): “In persuasive conversation, natural gaze behaviors improve a robot’s persuasiveness (Ham, Cuijpers, & Cabibi-han, 2015), even more than using expressive vocalizations (Chidambaram, Chiang, & Mutlu, 2012).”
• Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development (2018, background): “…Breazeal, 2004; Shinozawa et al., 2005; Bainbridge et al., 2008), touch and gesture (Shiomi et al., 2010; Ham et al., 2011; Nakagawa et al., 2011; Chidambaram et al., 2012; Baroni et al., 2014), gazing (Ham et al., 2011), robot and user gender (Siegel, 2008; Nakagawa et al., 2011), vocal cues…”