Different paths to economic reform in Russia and China: causes and consequences

By T. Buck, Igor Filatotchev, P. Nolan, Mike Wright. 2000

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d45612ce51fa7d748d754cf6ed3f3a368955389

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. K. Meyer
2. D. Ahlstrom
3. Mike W. Peng
4. O. Yau
5. Jenny S. Y. Lee
6. A. Tse
7. L. Sin
8. Raymond P. M. Chow

In Political Science and International Relations

1. D. Ahlstrom
2. Mike W. Peng
3. K. Meyer
4. P. Robson
5. Richard T. Harrison

In Strategy and Management

1. Mike W. Peng
2. K. Meyer
3. D. Ahlstrom
4. M. Dacin
5. Edward Levitas
6. O. Yau
7. Jenny S. Y. Lee
8. A. Tse

Citations in the corpus

• The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts (2008, background): “For example, Chinese firms were able to attract foreign investors by letting them ‘‘cherry-pick’’ the best assets and human capital, while such an arrangement was resisted by Russian workers (Buck et al., 2000).”
• A Dual Networks Perspective on Inter-Organizational Transfer of R&D Capabilities: International Joint Ventures in the Chinese Automotive Industry (2005, unknown): “Like other business organizations, IJVs are not isolated islands, but are deeply embedded in a nexus of socioeconomic relationships of related organizations.”
• The Increasing Role of Small Business in the Chinese Economy (2003, background): “Buck et al. (2000) argue that China adopted a “gradualist” path, whereby incremental, partial reforms started as localized experiments that spread inexorably gradually to replace central planning.”
• Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia (2004, background): “Additionally, Buck et al. (2000) suggest that the attractiveness of Russian firms as prospective investments is hurt by the inadequacies of their managers.”
• Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions (2005, background): “So far only few studies directly compare business in China and a CEE economy (Child and Markóczy, 1993; Buck et al., 2000; White and Linden, 2002; Michailova and Worm, 2003; Hitt et al., 2004).”
• An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities (2008, unknown): “In the final case, we compare firms from Russia and Japan, which are similar in terms of costs and contingencies, but differ in terms of the extent of complementarities.”