Behind the Scenes and Screens Insights into the Human Dimension of Covert and Cyberbullying

By Barbara Spears, Phillip Thomas Slee, L. Owens, Bruce Johnson. 2009

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c7e5b5cbbcb352140721bfc56d86f79bcec2ceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? (2012, background): “Cross-sectional studies suggest that being victimised in cyberspace is also associated with psychological difficulties (Mason 2008), stronger negative feelings, fear and feelings of helplessness (Spears et al. 2009), and also with depression (Ybarra 2004).”
Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health (2013, background): “…due to the unique aspects associated with cyberbullying: The 24/7 nature of the bullying; the anonymity aspects; the broader audience available; and the significant power of written and visual electronic media (Campbell, Cross, Spears, & Slee, 2010; Cross et al., 2009; Spears et al., 2008, 2009).”
Emotional and behavioural problems in the context of cyberbullying: a longitudinal study among German adolescents (2012, background): “As during adolescence, cyberbullying incidents increasingly gain a sexual connotation (Spears et al. 2009), this may also be harder for girls to cope with or may make girls easier or more frequent targets.”
Cyber-Aggression: Definition and Concept of Cyberbullying (2010, background): “Others have examined cyberbullying experiences from the points of view of cyber-victims and even cyber-bullies and practitioners (Campbell, 2005; Dooley et al., 2009; Spears et al., 2009); however, there is no empirical study that has looked at terminologies used for such negative behaviours from th”
Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation (2012, background): “…is in contrast to studies where students have expressed the opinion that cyberbullying is harsher than traditional bullying because of the possible anonymity of the bully, that it is hard to get away from the cyberbully and that cyberbullies can be nastier (Cross et al. 2009; Spears et al. 2009).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “There is the potential to make more use of young people themselves, not only as participants in focus groups, but also by involving them as researchers themselves, in the design of the study, and gathering data (Spears et al., 2009).”
What Makes a Bully a Cyberbully? Unravelling the Characteristics of Cyberbullies across Twenty-Five European Countries (2013, background): “Most studies have either used a qualitative approach investigating self-reports of cyberbullies or others’ beliefs about them (e.g. Spears et al., 2009; Vandebosch & van Cleemput, 2008), reporting incidences of traditional bullying, cyberbullying, or both (e.g. Patchin & Hinduja, 2006; Slonje &…”
Cyberbullying: Labels, Behaviours and Definition in Three European Countries (2010, background): “Different classifications have been proposed: for example covert and overt cyberbullying (Spears et al., 2009), cyberbullying by Phone or by PC (Smith et al.”
Cyberbullying Definition Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Six European Countries (2012, unknown): “Qualitative research has found that young people consider that the perpetrator must have the intent to harm another person in order to define this behavior as cyberbullying.(2,11,12,14)”