Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty

By M. Dancy, Charles Henderson. 2010

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Faculty Motivation: A Gateway to Transforming Engineering Education (2014, methodology): “…Cutler, Froyd, Prince, & Henderson, 2011; Borrego et al., 2010; J. L. Cooper, MacGregor, Smith, & Robinson, 2000; M. M. Cooper, 1995; Cutler, 2013; Dancy & Henderson, 2010; Felder & Brent, 1999; Froyd, Borrego, Cutler, Henderson, & Prince, 2013; Prince, Borrego, Henderson, Cutler, & Froyd, 2013)…”
The Roles of STEM Faculty Communities of Practice in Institutional and Departmental Reform in Higher Education (2017, background): “…research has identified instructional practices that contribute to increased student learning and improved outcomes in STEM education, the adoption of these practices has not widely spread to create large-scale change across the academy (Austin, 2011; Dancy & Henderson, 2010; Fairweather, 2009).”
Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. (2014, background): “How prevalent is the use of research-based instructional strategies by physics faculty in the United States? How is [research-based strategy X] typically implemented? What is the nature of faculty-student interactions during Peer Instruction? What instructional practices foster an interactive, colla”