Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms

By Hüseyin Tanriverdi. MIS Q., 2005

928 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bc34b3e8933cf29ab8aed132b25874883a42007

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Mobile Application Usability: Conceptualization and Instrument Development (2015, methodology): “Consistent with prior research, we used the χ2-difference test (see Tanriverdi 2005; Wallace et al. 2004) and comparative model fit.”
The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance (2016, background): “Prior research has found that several types of these capabilities (e.g. agility (Sambamurthy et al. 2003), knowledge management (Tanriverdi 2005), innovation-supportive organizational culture (Benitez ‐ Amado et al. 2010)) act as intermediate variables on the relationship between IT capabilities…”
Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity (2012, background): “Research and development knowledge, combined with operations knowledge is used by a firm to develop and produce new products and services (Tanriverdi 2005).”
Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership (2014, background): “Similarly, KM scholars have also showcased that managing knowledge has positive association with organizational performance (Bogner & Bansal, 2007; Lee & Choi, 2003; Tanriverdi, 2005).”
Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities (2010, background): “IT’s contribution and assistance in augmenting, building, and strengthening firms’ knowledge capabilities have been recognized (e.g., Alavi and Leidner 2001, Sambamurthy and Subramani 2004, Tanriverdi 2005).”
Leveraging Digital Technologies: How Information Quality Leads to Localized Capabilities and Customer Service Performance (2013, background): “Digital technologies are known to be a key enabler of organizational capabilities (e.g., Banker et al. 2006; Mithas et al. 2011; Pavlou and El Sawy 2011; Tanriverdi 2005).”
Does Knowledge Management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance (2012, background): “In a survey of 250 US firms, Tanriverdi (2005) found that information technology-relatedness ( " the use of common information technology infrastructures and common information technology management processes across business units " ) of a MNC increases its KM capability, which in turn positively…”
Knowledge complementarity, knowledge absorption effectiveness, and new product performance: The exploration of international joint ventures in China (2013, background): “We define knowledge absorption effectiveness as the aptitude of the IJV to organize and share existing knowledge, gather and assimilate each partner’s complementary knowledge, and collectively generate new knowledge (Gold, Malhotra, & Segars, 2001; Tanriverdi, 2005).”
Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology (2006, background): “This makes it extremely difficult for IT to respond quickly to new business models that require integration across business units [87, 92].”
IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance (2011, background): “The relationship between IT and firm performance is a crucial research issue that symbolizes the value of information systems research (Devaraj & Kohli, 2003; Tanriverdi, 2005).”
The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships (2010, background): “IS resources, such as IT relatedness (Tanriverdi 2005), IT-business partnership (Piccoli and Ives 2005), and IS planning and change management (Clark et al. 1997) are distinguished from IT assets by their intangible nature: one cannot purchase an IS resource directly from a vendor.”