Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries
By Wendy Johnson, T. Bouchard, Robert Krueger, Matthew McGue, I. Gottesman. 2004
332 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b9d8c121cd5f2933d3117b0827afbb2257c0d3f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Richard J. Haier
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- K. McGrew
- Wendy Johnson
- Ian J. Deary
- Matthew R. Reynolds
- J. Nijenhuis
- A. Kaufman
In Social Psychology
- Richard J. Haier
- Wendy Johnson
- T. Bouchard
- L. Waterhouse
- Ian J. Deary
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- J. Nijenhuis
- R. Berk
Citations in the corpus
- Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests (2012, result): “Moreover, COG-g factors extracted from different intelligence test batteries have been found to correlate perfectly with each other (Johnson et al., 2004; Keith, Kranzler, & Flanagan, 2001), and our study shares a similar methodology in that scores from individually administered test batteries were…”
- Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie (2007, result): “We do not because the results would be functionally equivalent to the analysis we do present here as the g factors derived from each of the three test batteries contained in our data are completely correlated (Johnson, Bouchard, Krueger, McGue, & Gottesman, 2004).”
- The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized (2005, background): “In combination with our earlier findings regarding the consistency of general intelligence factors across test batteries (Johnson et al., 2004), our results point unequivocally to the existence of a general intelligence factor contributing substantively to all aspects of intelligence.”
- Genetic foundations of human intelligence (2009, background): “it has been demonstrated that, when test batteries are even reasonably diverse, g scores from different batteries of tests correlate all-but perfectly (Johnson et al. 2004; Johnson et al. 2008b).”
- The Neuroscience of Intelligence (2016, background): “…gfactors derived from different test batteries correlate nearly perfectly with each other as long as each battery has a sufficient number of tests that sample a broad range of mental abilities, and the tests are given to people sampled from the wide range of ability (Johnson et al., 2004, 2008b).”
- Multiple Intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review (2006, background): “The significant intercorrelations of IQ subskills (Johnson et al., 2004; Larson & Saccuzzo 1989; Watkins & Cavinez, 2004) argue against the possibility of discrete intelligence-by-intelligence content processing that Gardner (1999) claimed was a requirement of MI theory (p. 99).”
- Still just 1 g: Consistent results from five test batteries (2008, methodology): “Recently, however, Johnson et al. (2004) provided such direct evidence.”
- Personality Psychology and Economics (2011, unknown): “Krueger and colleagues have recently demonstrated that other moderators also influence the heritability of traits (see Krueger, South, Johnson et al. [2008]).”