Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie

By Wendy Johnson, T. Bouchard. 2007

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca1ea4f8a887cf812889a1deb0ea5c1dda4ffd35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Sex, intelligence and educational achievement in a national cohort of over 175,000 11-year-old schoolchildren in England. (2010, background): “…residual score (d=.26) is equivalent to that previously reported for this age group (Deary, Strand, et al., 2007; Van der Sluis et al., 2008), and is larger than the gender effect on verbal reasoning out with adjusting for the general ability factor, as predicted by Johnson and Bouchard (2007).”
Genetic foundations of human intelligence (2009, unknown): “There is psychometric and neuroscientific evidence that this could be the case as well (Johnson et al. 2008a; Johnson and Bouchard 2007a, b).”
Predicting school achievement in boys and girls (2008, background): “This approach is especially interesting in the light of recent studies showing that general intelligence masks dimensions on which sex differences in mental abilities lie (Johnson & Bouchard, 2007).”
Working memory tasks differ in factor structure across age cohorts: Implications for dedifferentiation. (2010, background): “…division that is consistent with working memory comprising multiple, domainspecific resources (e.g., Baddeley, 2007; Baddeley & Logie, 1999; Johnson & Bouchard, 2007a,b; Logie & van der Meulen, 2009; Saito, Logie, Morita & Law, 2008), that also show different age-related trajectories…”
Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. (2009, background): “…verbal ability scales and the well-known longitudinal consistencies of the covariance structures between measures of these constructs (Carroll, 1993; Johnson & Bouchard, 2007a, 2007b; Lubinski, 2004; Snow et al., 1996), it would be surprising if modern spatial ability assessments did not uncover…”