Still just 1 g: Consistent results from five test batteries

By Wendy Johnson, J. Nijenhuis, T. Bouchard. 2008

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2063f38bd5a86dc1c4723c3c66809f7d120b7f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data (2018, background): “The g-factor explains around half of people’s intellectual differences [16] and shows good reliability across sets of cognitive tasks [17].”
Gray Matter and Intelligence Factors: Is There a Neuro-g?. (2009, background): “If this is true, then samples with a predominance of examinees using verbal strategies will show different brain areas than samples with a predominance of visually-oriented examinees (Johnson et al., 2008).”
Genetic foundations of human intelligence (2009, background): “…different assemblages of mental tests would differ—and therefore might rank people quite differently—it has been demonstrated that, when test batteries are even reasonably diverse, g scores from different batteries of tests correlate all-but perfectly (Johnson et al. 2004; Johnson et al. 2008b).”
The Neuroscience of Intelligence (2016, background): “…gfactors derived from different test batteries correlate nearly perfectly with each other as long as each battery has a sufficient number of tests that sample a broad range of mental abilities, and the tests are given to people sampled from the wide range of ability (Johnson et al., 2004, 2008b).”
Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm (2011, background): “…which frame and coordinate the functioning of the narrow abilities; and, finally, general intelligence (called psychometric g in psychometric literature), underlying everything, at a third level (Carroll 1993; Deary 2000; Gustafsson and Undheim 1996; Hunt 2011; Jensen 1998; Johnson et al. 2008).”