Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm.
By S. Otten, G. Moskowitz. 2000
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b82f11faa67d0aabf2d2e3b3ab7997c6f7e6baa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- John F. Dovidio
- Pascal Huguet
- S. Gaertner
- Isabelle Régner
- R. Banse
- Miles Hewstone
- Peter Glick
In Social Psychology
- John F. Dovidio
- Bertram Gawronski
- S. Gaertner
- Miles Hewstone
- Peter Glick
- K. Kawakami
- Victoria M. Esses
- Isabelle Régner
In Sociology and Political Science
- John F. Dovidio
- Bertram Gawronski
- S. Gaertner
- Miles Hewstone
- K. Kawakami
- Peter Glick
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Tamar Saguy
Citations in the corpus
- Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity (2007, background): “Emotionally, people spontaneously experience more positive affect towards other members of the ingroup than towards members of the outgroup (Otten & Moskowitz, 2000).”
- Implicit bias in impression formation: associations influence the construal of individuating information (2003, result): “Similar results were found by Otten and Moskowitz (2000) who demonstrated that the spontaneous interpretation of ambiguous behavioural episodes varies as a function of the target’s group membership (in-group vs. out-group) manipulated Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Eur.”
- Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances (2007, background): “…a myriad of findings in the social-categorization literature (e.g., Cadinu & Rothbart, 1996; Dovidio, Glick, & Rudman, 2005; Gaertner & Insko, 2000; Otten & Moskowitz, 2000; Tajfel & Turner, 1979), putting individuals into separate groups typically strengthens (or even creates) stereotypes rather…”
- Rival conceptions of rivalry: why some competitions mean more than others (2015, unknown): “According to SIT, an in-group bias is omnipresent provided there is a salient outgroup (Otten & Moskowitz, 2000).”
- Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future (2003, background): “Emotionally, people spontaneously experience more positive affect toward other members of the ingroup than toward members of the outgroup (Otten & Moskowitz, 2000), particularly toward those ingroup members who are most prototypical of their group (Hogg & Hains, 1996).”
- Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview (2010, background): “Emotionally, people spontaneously experience more positive affect toward members of their ingroup than toward members of outgroups (Otten & Moskowitz, 2000), particularly toward ingroup members who are most prototypical of their group (Hogg & Hains, 1996).”