Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development
By Dawn R. DeTienne. 2010
621 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59615fb437127196ba94ac32d9c3fe988fed7a45
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mattias Nordqvist
- A. McKelvie
- Dawn R. DeTienne
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Karl J. Wennberg
- Holger Patzelt
- Alfredo De Massis
- Johan Wiklund
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- A. McKelvie
- Mattias Nordqvist
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Karl J. Wennberg
- Holger Patzelt
- Johan Wiklund
- Philipp Sieger
- F. Liñán
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Mattias Nordqvist
- Thomas M. Zellweger
- Alfredo De Massis
- Philipp Sieger
- Dawn R. DeTienne
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Holger Patzelt
- Karl J. Wennberg
Citations in the corpus
- How should we divide the pie? Equity distribution and its impact on entrepreneurial teams ☆ (2015, background): “…these spirals were more likely to experience team member exit which is defined “as the process by which the founders […] leave the firm they helped to create; thereby removing themselves, in varying degree, from the primary ownership and decision-making structure of the firm” (DeTienne, 2010: 204).”
- Firm exit after distress: differentiating between bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation and M&A (2011, positive): “2009), performance levels triggering exit are dependent on the expectations of the individual entrepreneurs (DeTienne 2010; Headd 2003; Wennberg et al. 2010).”
- Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis (2015, background): “…Brush, 2013; Verheul et al., 2005), the increasing scholarly interest in entrepreneurial exit (Bates, 2005; Dehlen et al., 2014; Fackler et al., 2013; Gimeno et al., 1997), and the importance of entrepreneurial exit to the founder, the fi rm, the industry, and the global economy (DeTienne, 2010).”
- Exit Strategies in Family Firms: How Socioemotional Wealth Drives the Threshold of Performance (2013, positive): “Entrepreneurial exit—the process by which owners leave the firm they helped to create (DeTienne, 2010)—is a rapidly growing topic in scholarly literature as researchers more and more acknowledge that entrepreneurship is an ongoing process of not only identifying and creating ventures but also exitin”
- ENTREPRENEURIAL INCEPTION: THE ROLE OF IMPRINTING IN ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION (SUMMARY) (2013, background): “To date, research has shown that the founding conditions and the founder decisions at the onset of a venture have a significant impact on the venture's development trajectory (DeTienne, 2010; Milanov and Fernhaber, 2009; Stinchcombe, 1965).”
- To Merge, Sell, or Liquidate? Socioemotional Wealth, Family Control, and the Choice of Business Exit (2019, positive): “Options of Exit Both family and nonfamily owners may eventually exit for a host of idiosyncratic reasons (e.g., exhaustion, poor health, desire for change, better opportunities elsewhere, death of founder, divorce; DeTienne, 2010; Graebner, 2009) and adopt a variety of exit strategies (e.”
- Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement (2011, background): “Furthermore, DeTienne (2010) concludes that entrepreneurial exits may not only have benefits for the entrepreneur, but also for the firm, for the industry and for the economy in general.”
- Why Family Matters: The Impact of Family Resources on Immigrant Entrepreneurs’ Exit from Entrepreneurship (2016, positive): “First, we contribute to research on entrepreneurial exit by considering not only individual-level factors but also factors related to entrepreneurs’ family (DeTienne, 2010).”
- The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routes (2014, background): “Until now, this stream of research has focused primarily on the incumbent's perspective and has ignored the dyadic setting of firm-transfer processes (DeTienne, 2010; Graebner and Eisenhardt, 2004).”
- Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test (2015, background): “As with other early stage strategies, entrepreneurial exit strategies are likely to influence future decisions and behaviors, including resource acquisition, funding, growth, and risk-taking propensities (DeTienne, 2010; Fauchart and Gruber, 2011;Wiklund et al., 2003).”
- The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies (2020, background): “Several models have identified a series of phases that result in the creation/growth of a new venture (DeTienne 2010).”
- Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities (2018, background): “Retaining ownership and avoiding an exit from the business may, therefore, be a prime driver of entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector; a rather different scenario than in many other sectors where exit is often considered the natural final stage of the entrepreneurial process (DeTienne, 2010).”
- What is entrepreneurial failure? Implications for future research (2016, background): “Such exits are often classified as failures (DeTienne, 2010).”
- Stigma and business failure: implications for entrepreneurs’ career choices (2014, background): “A “business exit” can be defined as the path or process used by individuals pursuing entrepreneurial activity to depart from businesses they founded (DeTienne, 2010).”
- Entrepreneurial mindset: An integrated definition, a review of current insights, and directions for future research (2021, positive): “One element of the entrepreneurial process that has received little attention is the entrepreneurial exit, or the entrepreneur’s decision to leave the venture they helped to create (DeTienne, 2010).”