Mastery learning and assessment: Implications for students and teachers in an era of high‐stakes testing
By B. Zimmerman, Maria K. DiBenedetto. 2008
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/594bfe5dd44429daf82919e403d06b3c6f5299d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Bram De Wever
- Eric M. Anderman
- DeLeon L. Gray
- Martin Valcke
- Gale M. Sinatra
- Doug Lombardi
- E. Michael Nussbaum
- Stella Vosniadou
In Education
- Bram De Wever
- DeLeon L. Gray
- Gale M. Sinatra
- Eric M. Anderman
- Martin Valcke
- Zulaikha Mohamed
- Doug Lombardi
- Christian Mueller
Citations in the corpus
- Are they ready to teach? Student teachers’ readiness for the job with reference to teacher competence frameworks (2017, background): “With reference to this benchmark, 80% or higher is considered to attain the mastery level (Zimmerman and Dibenedetto 2008).”
- The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners (2012, background): “Rather, we agree with others who argue that assessments should promote mastery of content (Blumenfeld et al., 1991; Zimmerman & Dibenedetto, 2008).”