Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes

By Maarten Vansteenkiste, Stijn Smeets, Bart Soenens, W. Lens, Lennia Matos, Edward L. Deci. 2010

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/590d4a9f4a6e6768e8875074a0b118f2ab139543

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions (2020, unknown): “Although structure can especially enhance competence satisfaction, its effects are influenced by how it is delivered (Soenens & Vansteenkiste, 2010).”
Perfectionism and Motivation of Adolescents in Academic Contexts. (2014, background): “Vansteenkiste et al. (2010) found that the personal standards dimension of perfectionism correlated negatively with acceptability of cheating as well as actual cheating behavior.”
Perceived structure and achievement goals as predictors of students' self-regulated learning and affect and the mediating role of competence need satisfaction (2013, background): “…goals are adaptive, our study indicates that performance-approach goals may not be as harmful as it had been originally thought, partly because of the recent conceptualization of performance-approach goals which detaches reasons from aims (see Elliot, 2005; Vansteenkiste et al., 2010).”
Achievement Goals, Reasons for Goal Pursuit, and Achievement Goal Complexes as Predictors of Beneficial Outcomes: Is the Influence of Goals Reducible to Reasons? (2017, unknown): “…reasons from goals, and that the autonomous reasons connected to the achievement goals were found to be stronger (Gillet et al., 2015), more robust (Vansteenkiste et al., 2010a), and more important (Deci & Ryan, 2016) predictors of beneficial outcomes Vansteenkiste et al., 2014a, for a more…”