Collective (Team) Learning Process Models: A Conceptual Review

By Randall J. Knapp. 2010

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/583fdbdb87cf84918557b0b39b4f6ec7911e2d1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Jonas Ohlsson
2. Eva Kyndt
3. Filip Dochy
4. P. Van den Bossche
5. E. Raes
6. Stefan Decuyper

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jonas Ohlsson
2. Eva Kyndt
3. Filip Dochy
4. P. Van den Bossche
5. E. Raes
6. Stefan Decuyper

In Social Psychology

1. Jonas Ohlsson
2. Eva Kyndt
3. Filip Dochy
4. P. Van den Bossche
5. E. Raes
6. Stefan Decuyper

Citations in the corpus

• An Exploratory Study of Group Development and Team Learning (2015, background): “…the most important predictors of team learning behaviour: every study examining its effect on team learning showed a positive and signifi cant relationship (e.g., Brousseau, 1997; Day, Gronn, & Salas, 2004; Edmondson, 1999, 2002; Edmondson et al., 2001; Knapp, 2010; Van den Bossche et al., 2006).”
• Team Learning: Collective Reflection Processes in Teacher Teams. (2013, background): “The reflection loop son team A, although more or less critical or deep going, enables team members to extend conceptual reasoning and thereby afford potentials of double loop learning processes including increased awareness and more elaborated shared task interpretations (Knapp, 2010; Argyris and Sc”