Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model

By M. Assink. 2006

583 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5790a3bc084f3cdef9b6724af9955d65100fc16a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda (2017, background): “021 the exploitation of existing technologies with the exploration of new ones (March, 1991; Tushman and O'Reilly, 1996); a combination of factors including their aversion to risk, inflexibility and cultural inertia limit their ability to generate radical or disruptive innovations (Assink, 2006).”
Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry (2021, background): “This supports the idea that risk aversion may be intensified for radical technologies (Assink, 2006; Radnejad and Vredenburg, 2019).”
Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom (2019, background): “As developing market disruptive capability entails costs (Assink, 2006; Henderson, 1993) and risk (McDermott & O'Connor, 2002; O'Connor, Ravichandran, & Robeson, 2008), each organisation would make a calculative judgement in determining whether the cost associated with such innovation could be…”
Absorptive capacity, innovation and cultural barriers: A conditional mediation model (2014, methodology): “Building on the previous works of Assink (2006) and Bureš (2003), five items compose the scale for cultural barriers.”
Agility in responding to disruptive digital innovation: Case study of an SME (2018, background): “Although the need to develop capabilities in keeping with DDI in a hypercompetitive environment has been well established (Assink, 2006; Christensen, 1997; Teece et al., 2016), the concurrent need to mitigate against organizational rigidity has been much less appreciated (Leonard‐Barton, 1992; Lu & ”