Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues

By Xiangying Jiang, W. Grabe. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2007

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

As an instructional tool, graphic organizers (GOs) have been highly recommended and used in contemporary classrooms. Over the past decade, a number of concerns have been raised about claims for the effectiveness of GOs. These concerns involve the inconsistent research results on student improvements, the limitation in generalizability from research studies, and the need for research studies with second language (L2) students and with more extended instructional exposure time. This paper argues that GOs, which directly represent the discourse structures of a text, provide stronger evidence for the effectiveness of the technique, and these versions of GOs should be adopted in comprehension instruction. The authors propose a number of generic forms of graphic representations that apply to regularly recurring text structures, and recommend further research on the impact of GOs with learners of English as a second or foreign language as well as research that involves more extended instructional time.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/562a62720f3959d2959d3cbf980a7ca543dbaf10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
  2. Suzanne T. M. Bogaerds-Hazenberg
  3. Claude Goldenberg
  4. H. van den Bergh

In Education

  1. Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
  2. Suzanne T. M. Bogaerds-Hazenberg
  3. Claude Goldenberg
  4. H. van den Bergh

In Information Systems

  1. Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
  2. Suzanne T. M. Bogaerds-Hazenberg
  3. Claude Goldenberg
  4. H. van den Bergh

Citations in the corpus