A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes
By Lucy L. Gilson, Christina E. Shalley. 2004
788 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/556cf267b531a4c017ef0ea61440a2f7ed4ce1e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- Christina E. Shalley
- Markus Baer
- I. Hoever
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Xiaomeng Zhang
- Tae-Yeol Kim
- Neil Anderson
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Jing Zhou
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Sharon K. Parker
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Abraham Carmeli
- Markus Baer
- D. van Knippenberg
In Social Psychology
- Jing Zhou
- Sharon K. Parker
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Jin Nam Choi
- D. van Knippenberg
- Sandra Ohly
- Christina E. Shalley
Citations in the corpus
- Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors (2006, background): “For example, Gilson & Shalley (2004) argued that organizational tenure leads to skills and knowledge that are beneficial to creativity but at the same time leads to a tendency to adhere to strict routines rather than to seek new approaches to work.”
- Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction (2012, background): “Although individual team members are the ones who significantly influence team creativity processes (Gilson & Shalley, 2004; Janssen, van de Vliert, & West, 2004) and actually determine team creativity and innovation (Pirola-Merlo & Mann, 2004; West & Anderson, 1996), how team diversity affects…”
- Intervening to Enhance Proactivity in Organizations: Improving the Present or Changing the Future (2018, background): “Tenure in the organization also constitutes a potential confound; as tenure increases, individuals are less likely to initiate new approaches to work (Gilson & Shalley, 2004).”
- Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, background): “For example, team creative processes have been defined as “members working together in such a manner that they link ideas from multiple sources, delve into unknown areas to find better or unique approaches to a problem, or seek out novel ways of performing a task” (Gilson & Shalley, 2004: 454).”
- Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Promotion Focus and Creative Process Engagement (2014, background): “Engagement in the creative process represents a necessary first step toward creativity (Gilson and Shalley 2004; Shalley 1991, 1995).”
- INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GROWTH NEED STRENGTH, WORK CONTEXT, AND JOB COMPLEXITY ON SELF-REPORTED CREATIVE PERFORMANCE (2009, background): “In addition, job-required creativity has been found to predict team creative performance (Gilson & Shalley, 2004).”
- Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams (2012, background): “Extant studies of team creativity have highlighted the importance of group composition and team emergent states or processes, such as a supportive climate (Gilson & Shalley, 2004), intra-team communication (Leenders, Van Engelen, & Kratzer, 2003), and team conflict (Chen, 2006).”
- Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? (2007, background): “Engagement in the creative processes can be conceptualized as a precondition for a creative outcome (Gilson & Shalley, 2004).”
- Entrepreneur training for creativity and innovation (2010, background): “, 2003) or on the level is being exercised: individual, team and organizational (Gilson and Shalley, 2004; Pirola-Merlo and Mann, 2004; Shalley et al., 2004; Bharadwai and Menon, 2000) etc.”