Intermodal perception of expressive behaviors: Relation of eye and voice?
By A. Walker-Andrews. 1986
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Lorraine E. Bahrick
- R. Lickliter
- Ross A. Flom
- Ryan Sowinski
- S. Place
- A. Walker-Andrews
- Nicholas J. Minar
Citations in the corpus
- Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “Similarly, by 3 months of age infants match facial and vocal affect expressed by familiar people in the absence of synchrony (Kahana-Kalman & WalkerAndrews, 2001) but it is not until 7 months of age that infants can match facial and vocal affect when synchrony cues are reduced and when the affect is”
- Recognition of Amodal Language Identity Emerges in Infancy (2013, background): “By 6 months, infants can perceive illusory spatiotemporal A-V relations (Scheier, Lewkowicz, & Shimojo, 2003) as well as A-V duration equivalence (Lewkowicz, 1986), and by 7 months infants can perceive face-voice affect equivalence (Walker-Andrews, 1986).”
- The emergence of multisensory systems through perceptual narrowing. (2009, background): “Moreover, older infants no longer rely on low-level attributes such as synchrony to perceive higher-level cues [ 20 ].”
- Perceptual biases for multimodal cues in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) affect recognition (2004, background): “The perception and integration of multimodal cues in the recognition of affective signals, like facial expressions and vocalizations, appears to follow a distinctive developmental pattern (Kuhl and Meltzoff 1982; Walker-Andrews 1986, 1997 ).”
- The development of infant discrimination of affect in multimodal and unimodal stimulation: The role of intersensory redundancy. (2007, background): “By approximately 7 months of age, infants can perceive affect in faces and can successfully match faces and voices on the basis of affect (Soken & Pick, 1992; Walker, 1982; Walker-Andrews, 1986), suggesting recognition of affect rather than discrimination based solely on featural differences.”
- Perception of the multisensory coherence of fluent audiovisual speech in infancy: its emergence and the role of experience. (2015, background): “gain increasing experience with the same visual stimuli as the experiment progresses (Bahrick et al., 1996, 1998, 2005; Walker-Andrews, 1986).”
- The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants: underlying mechanisms and its developmental persistence. (2008, background): “…of age can match audible and visible phonetic information but that only 8-month-old infants can perform intersensory gender matching (Kuhl andMeltzoff, 1982, 1984; Patterson andWerker, 1999, 2002, 2003; Poulin-Dubois et al., 1994; Walker-Andrews, 1986; Walker-Andrews et al., 1991; Walker, 1982).”
- Not all emotions are created equal: the negativity bias in social-emotional development. (2008, background): “…Nelson et al., 1979); suffice it here to say that a rudimentary ability to decode and categorize affective messages is present already by 7 months (e.g., Phillips, Wagner, Fells, & Lynch, 1990; Walker-Andrews, 1986) but continues to develop in the 2nd year (Baldwin & Moses, 1996; Nelson, 1987).”
- Infants' perception of expressive behaviors: differentiation of multimodal information. (1997, methodology): “In another experiment (Walker-Andrews, 1986), the lower part of the face was occluded (blocked off) so that synchrony between lip movements and vocalizations was not visible.”
- The role of person familiarity in young infants' perception of emotional expressions. (2001, background): “In contrast, findings from experimental investigations of infants’ recognition of emotional expressions suggest that only at around 7 months of age do infants match vocal and facial expressions of the same emotion (Soken & Pick, 1992; Walker-Andrews, 1986) or recognize that different examples of the”
- The development of intersensory temporal perception: an epigenetic systems/limitations view. (2000, background): “ing to Walker-Andrews (1997), the distinction between detection and discrimination, on the one hand, and recognition, on the other,”
- Infants' perception of the audible, visible, and bimodal attributes of multimodal syllables. (2000, background): “For example, it has been shown that neonates can equate auditory and visual inputs on the basis of intensity (Lewkowicz & Turkewitz, 1980) and that older infants can perceive audiovisual (AV) relations based on synchrony and duration (Bahrick, 1994, 1996; Lewkowicz, 1986, 1992a, 1992b, 1996b; Walker”
- Infant Categorization of Faces: Ladies First. (2005, unknown): “…& Nelson, 1999; Fagan & Singer, 1979; Field et al., 1984; Hains & Muir, 1996a, 1996b; Kestenbaum & Nelson, 1990; Langlois, Roggman, & Rieser-Danner, 1990; Ludemann & Nelson, 1988; Nelson & Collins, 1992; Pascalis, de Haan, Nelson, & de Schonen, 1998; Walker-Andrews, 1986; Weinberg & Tronick, 1996).”
- Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “For example, 5-month-old infants can match the auditory and visual expressions of affect produced by a stranger only when they are presented in synchrony, whereas 7-month-old infants can do so even when they are not presented in synchrony (Walker-Andrews, 1986).”
- The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. (2000, background): “…been shown to be skilled perceivers of amodal information (Bahrick, 1988, 1992; Bahrick & Lickliter, in press; Bahfick & Pickens, 1994; Spelke, 1979; Walker-Andrews, 1986), that is, information that is not specific to a particular sensory modality but is redundant across two or more modalities.”