Perceptual biases for multimodal cues in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) affect recognition

By L. Parr. 2004

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…all can perceive the correspondence of facial and vocal expressions during communicative encounters (Adachi, Kuwahata, Fujita, Tomonaga, & Matsuzawa, 2006; Ghazanfar & Logothetis, 2003; Ghazanfar et al., 2007; Izumi & Kojima, 2004; Jordan, Brannon, Logothetis, & Ghazanfar, 2005; Parr, 2004).”
The language void: the need for multimodality in primate communication research (2011, background): “For example, match-to-sample touch screen methods have been used successfully with several species, and can be employed to examine both visual and auditory signals (Parr 2004).”
Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals (2005, background): “Ghazanfar and Logothetis (2003) replicated a “McGurk-like” effect in macaque monkeys, showing that the subjects matched vocalizations with the corresponding facial gesture that originally accompanied the sound, and Parr (2004) found the same in chimpanzees.”
Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success (2008, background): “…in a variety of animal taxa (Rosenthal & Ryan 2000), including birds (Zuk et al. 1992; Jawor & Breitwisch 2004; Partan et al. 2005), primates (Parr 2004), fish (McLennan 2003; Smith & van Staaden 2006), amphibians (Narins et al. 2003), insects (Hill 2001; Virant-Doberlet & Cokl 2004) and…”