Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods
By Jan Barkmann, K. Glenk, A. Keil, C. Leemhuis, N. Dietrich, G. Gerold, R. Marggraf. 2008
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac02dc756db09f86be34597672356f8817715dcf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Watershed services of tropical forests: from hydrology to economic valuation to integrated analysis (2009, background): “Collaborations between hydrologists and economists are slowly increasing [41,45,46 ,50 ,51], although some times the inter-linkages remain weak [e.”
- How Much is that Ecosystem in the Window? The One with the Bio-diverse Trail (2008, background): “…of ecosystem services that can be explicitly included in a survey is limited (e.g. choice experiments typically address just four plus cost, for example Barkmann et al., 2008) while the number of ecosystems functions is numerous (e.g. Batker et al., 2005 identify twenty three diverse functions).”
- The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands (2011, background): “24 therefore confirms that, at least in terms of participants’ capacity, choice experiments can be applied to measure non-market environmental values in rural areas of developing countries, even where subsistence makes up the mainstay of livelihoods (cf. Barkmann et al., 2007; Barkmann et al., 2008)”
- Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and Alternatives (2013, methodology): “Much of the criticism is ‘internal’, i.e., from those who believe in the usefulness of the concept and seek improvements in terminologies (e.g., Boyd and Banzhaf 2007; Fisher et al. 2009) and methods (e.g., Barkmann et al. 2008).”
- Twenty thousand sterling under the sea : Estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity (2014, background): “Unfamiliarity with deep-sea ES per se is not a reason to abandon the DCE approach (Barkmann et al., 2008).”
- Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services § (2010, background): “‘‘Ecosystem functions for which the analyst finds no such benefit are not considered services and excluded from the valuation’’ (Barkman et al., 2008).”