Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses

By J. Miner. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of social identity theory with implications for training and development (2007, background): “Furthermore, individuals are comprised of multiple selves or identities (Ashforth and Mael, 1989; Fiske and Taylor, 1991; Hogg et al., 1995; James, 1891; Jenkins, 2004; Miner, 2002).”
The Rated Importance, Scientific Validity, and Practical Usefulness of Organizational Behavior Theories: A Quantitative Review (2003, background): “There is much more to accomplish as I have indicated elsewhere (Miner, 2002a).”
Differentiation in leader-member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach (2010, methodology): “Previous LMX research has focused on the in-groups rather than the out-groups (Miner, 2002, p. 350).”
Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors” (2003, background): “All this is said not with the intent of criticizing the use and development of theory, for which I have had a long-standing personal affinity (Miner, 2002), but to criticize the kind of overemphasis on theory that excludes any other possibility.”
Proactive personality and work performance in China: The moderating effects of emotional exhaustion and perceived safety climate (2009, background): “Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 24 26(1), 23–37 (2009) Human performance has arguably been a defi ning feature in the study of organizational behaviour for a long time.”