Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors”
By J. Miner. 2003
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acacd6a6e9dc94bb4b1f6dd3216bb77930bc2946
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005, background): “Gossip about inconsistent reviews and biased reviewers pervades academe, and studies have documented various biases of reviewers (Armstrong 1997; Bedeian 2003; Campanario 1996, 1998b; Ellison 2002; Hargens 1990; Horrobin 1990; Mahoney et al. 1978; Nylenna et al. 1994).”